Posts by Katie Kennedy

News

New AGS Chair and Chair Elect Announced

- by
Tags: Featured

The AGS is delighted to announce that, following the AGM held on 15th May, Alex Lee (Partner at HKA) has been elected as the new AGS Chair, with Geraint Williams (Associate Technical Director at HKA) elected as Chair Elect.

We extend our thanks to Vivien Dent for her outstanding leadership over the past two years as AGS Chair. Vivien will continue to support the Association as Immediate Past Chair alongside Ken Marsh, AGS Treasurer.

Thank you to Sally Hudson for your work over the past 6 years as AGS Officer.

Article

Reviving the Wild in the River Blythe

- by
Tags: Featured

The AGS has been supporting Projects for Nature, an initiative that aims to restore nature recovery in the UK, since 2024. Over the past year, the association has donated almost £6,400 to the Midlands Wild Revival fund which aims to revive wildlife on the River Blythe in Warwickshire.

This article, written by Emily Reilly who works for the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust, explains the progress made to the project so far and how the donation has been used.

The River Blythe Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), extending 45 km through the heart of Warwickshire, is a prime example of a river needing our help to recover from historic human interventions. Artificially straightened, widened, dredged and depleted of nature, the Blythe has suffered in the past. But now, Warwickshire Wildlife Trust are restoring natural processes and bringing wildlife back to the Blythe.

Through the Midlands Wild Revival project, Warwickshire Wildlife Trust are working with landowners, farmers and local communities to restore key sections of the river Blythe to a healthier condition. Positive interventions are being carried out to put meanders back into the Blythe, reconnect the river to its surrounding floodplain, and restore habitats for wildlife along its course.

Natural Flood Management (NFM) techniques are being used bring back features to the river that should occur naturally. Berms and flow deflectors have been installed to re-meander the river, directing water flow back into a wigglier, more variable state. Scrapes and ponds have been created on the floodplain, utilising pieces of un-farmed land to increase flood storage capacity along the river and create fantastic wetland and riparian habitat for plants, invertebrates and wading birds. Tens of thousands of native trees have been planted to enhance biodiversity, reduce soil erosion and restore hedgerows and islands of scrub for wildlife. Large areas of land have been seeded with wildflowers for pollinators.

The positive impacts of river restoration on the Blythe are being seen already, with native wading birds using newly created wetland scrapes, the shape and flow of the river improving where interventions have taken place, and newly restored hedgerows providing valuable habitat for birds and small mammals.

And this is only the start. The ultimate ambition for the Blythe is to continue to restore the river and eventually redefine Warwickshire’s landscape. To create a haven for wildlife where nature can thrive and give people the opportunity to connect with Warwickshire’s nature in ways that, for many, haven’t yet been possible. Warwickshire Wildlife Trust have been laying the groundwork for the rewilding of 750 acres of land along the Blythe since 2021 and are now taking the leap into rewilding history.

The funding support provided to the Midlands Wild Revival project from AGS is essential in helping us carry out this vision. Via Projects for Nature, a Crowdfunder initiative formed by The Council for Sustainable Business, Accenture, Defra, Natural England and the Environment Agency, donations from AGS are helping to continue Warwickshire Wildlife Trust’s work to restore natural ecological processes, improve climate resilience and move towards a more biodiverse landscape along the river Blythe SSSI.

The restoration and rewilding of the river Blythe is an ongoing process, and much work remains to be done. The progress made so far is a hopeful sign of what can be achieved when communities, conservationists, and supporters work together to heal and restore our natural waterways. As the Blythe slowly returns to a more natural state through continued restoration, we can ensure that future generations of people and wildlife will benefit from this vital watercourse.

More information about the Midlands Wild Revival project can be found at: https://www.projectsfornature.com/p/midlands-wild-revival

Image credit Ian Owen 2024

Article

Q&A with Mark Toye

- by
Tags: Featured

Name: Mark Toye
Job title: MD Ground Investigations England & Wales
Company: Igne

Who or what inspired you to join the geoscience industry?
Mrs Kirk, my A level Geology teacher at North Tyneside College.

Can you tell us about your career path to date?
I started as a graduate engineering geologist with Norwest Holst Soil Engineering at Leeds in February 1999 and stayed there through various name changes and base locations till Dec 2015 by then I was Pre-Construction Manager and had focused on tendering and estimating since late 2003.  In January 2016 I joined ESG formerly Soil Mechanics and now SOCOTEC leaving in December 2024 to join Igne as Managing Director for Ground Investigations in England and Wales.

How long have you held your current position for, and what inspired you to apply for the position?
Since December 2024 so at the time of writing this only two months. Impressed by Igne’s growth ambitions, team development focus, and dedication to the ground investigation market.

Some years ago, a good friend – who sadly died far too young – made me realise that you should focus on doing what makes you happy, if that’s not the case it’s time for a role change, company change or career change.

What does a typical day look like?
I think the beauty of the ground investigation industry is that there really are no typical days.

What are the most challenging aspects of your day-to-day role?
Sadly, ground investigation project budgets often don’t reflect the value and benefits they bring. Recruitment and insufficient entrants to the market is also a major challenge.

How do you manage a work/life balance?
Much better than I used to! When I started in the industry, I also played a lot of sport and those outside commitments meant that there were always time pressures particularly when working away, over more recent time I have got better at putting time aside for non-work activities and spending more time with family and friends.

What areas of the industry are you most passionate about?
Improving the quality and safety of the drilling industry.  There is still huge noncompliance with standards and specifications, AGS member companies have a major part to play in this they should only be utilising British Drilling Association Audited drillers when it comes to any ground investigation works otherwise, they are not complying with the current UK Ground Investigation Specification and other British Standards!

What lessons have you learnt throughout your career?
You can learn an awful lot from talking to an experienced driller and I have worked with some great individuals over the years – but don’t necessarily believe everything they tell you!

What can AGS Members do to address the gender imbalance and improve diversity within their organisations?
Treat everyone as individuals and celebrate the career successes of the remarkable women already in the industry to inspire others. Be engaging, honest, and free of preconceptions when interacting with all people.

How can AGS Members support graduates and early career professionals who are entering the industry?
Provide more training and work experience opportunities to help graduates understand the various aspects of the geotechnical and geological fields. Many geology graduates are unaware of the industry’s scope and the opportunities it offers. Collaborate with universities to better prepare graduates for the sector and its requirements.

What piece of advice would you give your younger self?
Avoid revolving dance floors – they will lead to persistent knee issues for the next 30 years!

Article Contaminated Land

Monitoring of Turbidity within Groundwater during Piling Operations

- by
Tags: Featured

Article provided by Andrew Tranter, Associate Technical Director at RSK

Turbidity is defined as the measure of the relative clarity of a liquid.  It is caused by the presence of organic and inorganic particulates from local sediments/rocks as well as microbial organisms that have been picked up/transported within the groundwater (Ref 1).

Turbidity is routinely monitored at groundwater abstraction wells (as required by the Drinking Water Inspectorate) for potable water supplies as an indicator for microbial organisms, particularly cryptosporidium. The shutdown of the public water supply at Brixham in May 2024 due cryptosporidium illustrates how severely water companies can be impacted by cryptosporidium.   Also, high turbidity levels may negatively impact on the water treatment process.  However, turbidity measurements cannot distinguish between microbial or mineral particulates, and therefore activities that could lead to an increase of mineral particles within the groundwater, such as piling, are undesirable.

In the first instance, a piling risk assessment should be undertaken in line with the Environment Agency’s updated guidance (Ref 2) (which has just been published) if piling operations have the potential to impact on a groundwater abstraction well (e.g. the site is located within Zone 1 of a Source Protection Zone (SPZ)).  A number of measures may be considered to mitigate risk, for example using a different piling technique or altering pile depth.  However, the Environment Agency will often request that groundwater monitoring is carried out when the site is located within Zone 1 of a SPZ, including the measurement of turbidity to confirm that the pilling operations have not adversely impacted the aquifer and abstraction well.

The AGS previously published ‘Assessment and Mitigation of Turbidity Risks from Piling’, dated July 2023 which focussed more on turbidity risk assessment but should be read in conjunction with this article.  There is currently no UK guidance on how turbidity should be monitored during piling operations, and therefore a discussion on the various instruments available, and important considerations in relation to the sampling methodology, is provided below.

Instruments for Monitoring Turbidity

Turbidity is measured using instruments that detect the amount of light scattered by particulates. High levels of scattered light correspond with higher levels of particulates and turbidity.  A range of light sources can be used depending on the technique, such as natural light (i.e. Secchi discs used for surface water measurements); tungsten lamps (i.e. used in bench top meters) and light emitting diodes (LED), which are often utilised within modern instruments used for groundwater sampling.  The results can be expressed in different units which are dependent on the technique, the most common are nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) or formazine nephelometric units (FNU), which are considered to be equivalent (Ref 3).

Instruments used for measuring turbidity within groundwater can be split into three broad categories: laboratory bench top meters, field portable meters, and dedicated probes attached to water quality devices.  A comparison of advantages and disadvantages of each technique are provided within Table 1, below.

Table 1: Comparison of different techniques.

Whilst undertaking sampling during piling operations the use of a water quality meter is considered to be the most suitable technique as it provides an immediate result of turbidity that allows rapid assessment of the condition of the aquifer.  A water quality meter can also measure other useful water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, redox, and pH.  Some water quality meters can also be linked to telemetry for continuous monitoring.

However, before selecting a water quality meter the manufacturer’s specification should be checked to ensure that the turbidity probe is not affected by ambient light or drift from temperature differences when using a flow cell during sampling. On the most sensitive sites, field readings should be cross-checked against laboratory data to confirm suitability of the method.

Borehole Construction

To ensure that the sampling is representative of the actual conditions within the aquifer, it is critical that careful consideration is given to the design and construction of the monitoring wells. Design objectives should be clearly stated as part of the piling risk assessment for the site, which are based upon the development of a conceptual site model (CSM) of realistic contaminant source-pathway-receptor linkages.

At least one well should be positioned hydraulically up-gradient, and two down-gradient of the site. If pragmatic within the site constraints, a stand-off from the monitoring well and the area subject to piling is beneficial to reduce the potential for the monitoring well to pick up localised disturbance of the soils during piling operations.

Furthermore, keeping a record of the position of the piling rig during piling operations is also useful to aid the interpretation of results.

The slotted section of the monitoring wells (i.e. response zone) should target the water body/depth of interest, including the full pile depth within the water body as defined by the CSM.  To prevent borehole installations from being clogged by fine sediments, a granular annulus is placed around the response zone. For fine sediments of less than 2mm it be also be necessary to wrap a geotextile membrane around the pipe.  However, the membrane should have a pore size of not less than 85 microns so that the target particles can pass through it (majority of suspended particles are <10 microns, and particles >100 microns are unlikely to stay suspended in groundwater (Ref 6). If the strata is fractured rock then geotextile membrane should not be used.  A bentonite seal is required above and below the response zone to prevent mixing from other strata/bodies of water.

Prior to sampling, the monitoring well will need to be thoroughly ‘developed’ in accordance with BS ISO 5667-11 (Ref 5) to remove any drilling fluids/sediment, and allow the surrounding granular filter to settle.  Once ‘developed’ the monitoring well should be left for the conditions to return to equilibrium with the surrounding groundwater, which can take several weeks depending on the surrounding stratum.

Following development and prior to sampling, monitoring wells require purging to remove any stagnant water and ensure that the sample is representative of the aquifer.  The quantity of water purged is dependent on the well construction and hydrogeological conditions.

Sampling method

A number of different techniques have been developed to collect groundwater samples.  Those that require the removal of significant amounts of water during purging and/or agitate the groundwater are not ideally suited for providing a rapid assessment of turbidity as they are likely to cause a temporary increase in the amount of sediment within the monitoring well, e.g. using bailers or HDPE pipe with foot valves.

The low flow/micro-purging technique, as outlined within BS ISO 5667-11, is considered to be the most suitable as it minimises the amount of disturbance to the groundwater, and can target specific depths of interest as defined by the CSM.  The technique involves removing a small volume of water at low flow rate to cause minimal disturbance to the aquifer. The tubing inlet should be placed within the response zone of the well. The monitoring equipment should be kept clean and calibrated in line with the manufacturer’s standards.

The number and frequency of monitoring rounds should be agreed in advance with the Environment Agency/Local Water Authority, and split into three phases: baseline (to characterise the initial condition of the groundwater); during piling (to assess any impact during piling operations); post-piling (to confirm there has been no longer term impact on the aquifer).  It is essential that the condition of the aquifer is well characterised prior to piling operations, and takes into account any seasonal fluctuations in the groundwater levels that may affect turbidity.  Therefore, more than one visit (often multiple visits) will be required to confirm the baseline turbidity concentrations. The frequency of monitoring during the operational phase will be determined by the risk assessment, in lower risk settings a daily reading may be sufficient, whereas in fractured rock close to the abstraction well then real-time monitoring may be required.

Conclusions

In summary, turbidity is an important water quality indicator used by water authorities to determine suitability of groundwater during abstraction.  Monitoring of turbidity is therefore typically required by the Environment Agency where a pilling risk assessment indicates there is a potential risk to the abstraction well (usually when the site is located within Zone 1 of a SPZ).  Turbidity results can be impacted by a wide range of factors, and therefore the following must be considered to ensure that they are reflective of the actual conditions with the aquifer.

  • Meters that can provide rapid on-site testing, and are rugged enough to survive the harsh conditions of a construction site, are preferable to ensure that any issues can be highlighted and acted upon in a timely manner. These need to be kept clean and calibrated in line with manufacture recommendations.
  • It is critical that boreholes are carefully constructed and ‘developed’ to minimise the amount of turbidity in the groundwater caused by the disturbance of the surrounding soils during drilling/sampling so that it is not attributed to the piling operations. The borehole should then be left to settle before monitoring starts, ideally for several weeks.
  • At least one well should be located hydraulically up-gradient and at least two down-gradient of the site so that the impact on the aquifer can be determined during piling operations. If practical (which is often not the case) a stand-off between the location of the monitoring wells and area subject to piling is beneficial to reduce any localised impact from piling on the well.
  • Baseline monitoring should be carried out prior to piling operations in order to characterise the turbidity concentration within the aquifer. To provide confidence in the results and assess any possible variation (e.g. seasonal), often multiple visits will be required.
  • The low flow/micro purging technique is considered to be the most suitable method for monitoring turbidity as it minimises disturbance to the aquifer. However, other techniques can be used with appropriate justification.

Ref 1 US Geological Society www.usgs.gov/labs/national-water-quality-laboratory/science/science-topics/turbidity.

Ref 2 CLAIRE, 2025, Piling and Penetrative Ground Improvement Methods on Land Affected by Contamination: Guidance on Pollution Prevention.

Ref 3  Word Health Organisation (WHO), 2017, Water Quality and Health Review of Turbidity: Information for regulators and water supplier.

Ref 4 British Standard, first published 2015, Code of Practice for Ground Investigations, ref BS5930+A1:2020

Ref 5 International Standards Organisation (ISO), 2009, Water Quality- Sampling Part 11: Guidance on Sampling of Groundwaters, ref ISO 5667-11:2009.

Ref 6 Burris et al, 2020.  Tunnelling, Chalk and turbidity: conceptual model of risk to groundwater public water supplies.  P. Burris, C. D. Speed, A. E. Saich, S. Hughes, S. Cole and M. Banks.  Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Article Geotechnical

Debunking Social Value Myths: What It Is and Why It Matters

- by
Tags: Featured

Article by Kalisha Sejpar (Associate, Ramboll)

At its core, Social Value is about maximising the positive impact that buildings, places and infrastructure have on society. It goes beyond just completing a technically sound project; it considers how that project contributes to local communities, the environment, and the economy in a meaningful way.

Social Value has become a crucial aspect of the engineering and construction industries in recent years, shaping the way projects are designed, delivered, and measured. However, its principles and applications are not well recognised across the majority of the ground engineering sector.

This article addresses some of the most common misconceptions about Social Value, providing clarity on what it means, why it is important, and how professionals in our industry can integrate it into their work.

Myth 1: “Social Value only applies to public contracts”

One of the most common misconceptions about Social Value is that it is only relevant for public sector contracts. This belief stems from the early adoption of Social Value policies in public procurement, such as the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, where the government first set out expectations for procurement decisions to take into account wider social, economic, and environmental impacts. The Social Value Model was then legislated in 2020, as outlined in Procurement Policy Note PPN 06/20, which solidified the commitment to embedding social value into the award of public sector contracts, assigning a minimum 10% weighting to it in tender evaluations. Social Value has since become an essential consideration for public sector clients, policymakers, and communities.

However, many private sector organisations are increasingly adopting Social Value principles voluntarily, driven by shifting public expectations, stakeholder pressure, and a desire to demonstrate corporate responsibility. While there may not be a legal mandate for private sector organisations to deliver Social Value, developers and investors are recognising the long-term benefits of integrating Social Value into their projects

For businesses, embracing Social Value is not only an ethical choice but a competitive one, as it helps improve reputations, build trust, and ultimately, win work across both public and private sectors.

—————-

Myth 2: “Social Value is just about STEM and job creation”

While STEM outreach and job creation are an important aspect of Social Value, they are just pieces of the puzzle. Social Value encompasses a much wider set of themes, enabling a range of social, economic, and environmental impacts. This can include enhancing physical and mental well-being, delivering environmental benefits, fostering diversity and inclusion, supporting SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises) and VCSEs (Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprise), improving educational and training opportunities, and engaging in co-design and delivery with communities. These are all critical components of Social Value that address the broader needs of communities, the environment, and society at large.

The broad scope of Social Value offers opportunities for a wide range of businesses and professionals to contribute. Contractors, consultants, and suppliers alike can integrate Social Value into their operations through various means. Social Value is also not limited to large businesses or those with specific expertise; it can be embedded into everyday practices across the supply chain, enabling businesses of all sizes to make a meaningful contribution.

The exact social value that a project delivers will depend on the needs of the local community and the priorities of the client. Social Value should be tailored to the people most impacted by the development, with outcomes defined based on local needs and the specific context of the project. This means that Social Value is not a one-size-fits-all solution; rather, it must be relevant and meaningful to the community in which the project takes place, focusing on the issues that matter most to those directly affected.

—————-

Myth 3: “Designing/ building a hospital or school counts as our Social Value”

Another common misconception is that simply contributing to the construction of projects such as hospitals or schools automatically counts as delivering Social Value.

A fundamental principle to recognise is that Social Value involves creating additional value beyond the intrinsic value that is inherently tied to fulfilling the primary purpose of a contract. So, although the creation of a school or hospital can be a significant step towards improving communities’ access to education and healthcare, Social Value goes beyond merely providing infrastructure. It’s about embedding positive, additional impacts throughout the project’s lifecycle, adding social, environmental, and economic benefits that extend beyond the primary objective.

This concept can be broken down into three distinct categories:

Inherent Social Value relates to the direct and primary impacts that an activity or contract delivers as part of its core purpose. For example, providing health services through the construction of a hospital is an inherent benefit, directly contributing to the community’s healthcare needs.

Embedded Social Value typically involves an organisation’s ‘business as usual’ activities that contribute to social value, typically delivered through practices like apprenticeship schemes, environmental policies and supply chain engagement. For example, sustainable supply chain practices, such as sourcing materials from local suppliers to reduce carbon emissions and support local economies.

Additional Social Value goes beyond both inherent and embedded value and involves intentionally creating extra, measurable societal benefits that are not an intrinsic part of the core service. For example, encouraging staff to volunteer in community projects, like creating a green space local to the hospital site.

When delivering Social Value through contracts, Inherent Social Value cannot be claimed, however Additional Social Value, and where appropriate Embedded Social Value, can be claimed, but only for the tangible benefits that arise directly from the contract in question.

—————-

Myth 4: “We already do CSR, so we’re delivering Social Value”

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reflects a commitment by businesses to operate responsibly, ensuring they adhere to ethical standards and hold themselves accountable for their actions. CSR is primarily voluntary and self-regulatory. It predominantly revolves around internally focused initiatives within business operations, with strategies often self-determined, guided by an organisation’s own priorities rather than being shaped by the needs of a particular community, client, or contract. CSR activities can be valuable, but they do not necessarily meet the criteria for Social Value especially as they often comprise one-off endeavours that do not necessarily occur where contracts are being delivered. However, where relevant, they can contribute to Embedded social value.

Social Value, by contrast, is contract-specific, locally focused, and embedded into the delivery of a project or service. It requires organisations to consider how they can maximise tangible, lasting benefits for the communities directly affected by their work.

For example, an organisation may have a CSR initiative that funds tree planting in various locations nationwide. While beneficial, it’s a broad, self-directed effort. In contrast, to deliver Social Value on a local infrastructure project, the organisation can plant trees in nearby urban areas, working with local schools to educate students on biodiversity and climate resilience. This ensures the impact is place-based, directly benefiting the local community and aligning with project-specific goals.

The key distinction therefore is that Social Value is an integrated and accountable part of project delivery, not just a standalone corporate initiative.

—————-

Myth 5: “Social Value is not my responsibility – someone else will deal with it”

Social Value is everyone’s business. Regardless of role, sector, or project stage, all professionals involved in the built environment—including geotechnical and geoenvironmental specialists—have a part to play in delivering meaningful benefits to society.

Social Value is not limited to those in client-facing roles or those directly involved in community engagement, or on-site construction – it is relevant to all services including consultancy, design, investigation, and construction, and applies equally to those conducting early-stage desk studies as to those delivering on-site groundworks.

Social Value can take many forms across the geotechnical and geoenvironmental sector. Some examples include:

  • Contractors working in an economically deprived area can create targeted employment and training opportunities for local workers from disadvantaged backgrounds;
  • Consultants can share findings on geotechnical hazards or contamination risks with local communities, helping to raise awareness of climate resilience and environmental sustainability, and helping communities feel more connected to the development process;
  • Contractors can minimise environmental disruption by adopting low-carbon ground improvement techniques, sourcing locally sourced materials and implement construction practices that minimising noise;
  • Consultants can implement solutions that minimise soil disturbance, allowing for the preservation of trees and green areas, which supports biodiversity and provides space for community activities;
  • Consultants and contractors can volunteer time for example restoring local wetlands, or providing technical advice on local geotechnical or geoenvironmental hazards, involving residents and improving overall community wellbeing

While some of these outcomes are often by-products of good engineering practice, there is now a growing expectation—from governments, clients, and the public—that they be planned, measured, and maximised.

Embedding Social Value into projects is not about reinventing roles as professionals but rather being intentional about maximising positive outcomes.

—————-

Myth 6: “There’s no contractual commitment to Social Value”

Another common misconception is that Social Value commitments made during tender are not enforceable and that there are no real consequences for failing to deliver them. However, this is increasingly not the case. Clients, both public and private sector, are strengthening their approach to Social Value by integrating mechanisms into contracts.

For example, many contracts include performance monitoring, with Social Value within Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). This means that not delivering on your commitments can lead to removal from the project/framework and significant reputational damage. Others go further by enforcing financial penalties for non-delivery.

Going forwards, under the Procurement Act 2023, contracting authorities will have greater flexibility to assess supplier performance over time, meaning that failure to embed and deliver Social Value could lead to exclusion from future contract opportunities. Similarly, government guidance for the new Social Value model is to include all social value commitments in the contract either as contract terms, key performance indicators, or performance indicators.

With growing scrutiny, businesses must take Social Value commitments seriously. This requires moving beyond vague promises and ensuring that measurable, meaningful outcomes are delivered and performance evidenced at regular intervals throughout the contract lifecycle.

—————-

Myth 7: “It’s all about maximising SROI”

There is a common misconception that Social Value is primarily about achieving the highest possible Social Return on Investment (SROI) or maximised financial figures. While monetisation can be a useful tool in measuring Social Value, it is not the sole focus.

Social Value measurement frameworks and reporting tools such as TOMs (Themes, Outcomes and Measures) system have been developed to provide structured methodologies; some of these frameworks include financial proxies—assigning a monetary value to social impacts to help quantify their relative importance. However, this approach, while useful for benchmarking and comparison, does not capture the full picture of Social Value.

A growing concern is the tendency to focus too heavily on headline financial figures, leading to what some refer to as “social value washing”—prioritising impressive-looking numbers over meaningful, long-term impact. This trend mirrors similar challenges seen in other sustainability fields, such as carbon reduction, where measurement frameworks sometimes overshadow the real objective. Social Value should not become a numbers game but should remain centred on genuine, place-based benefits that create lasting change.

Ultimately, Social Value is about people, not just numbers. To ensure genuine impact, organisations must look beyond financial figures and focus on creating meaningful, measurable, and lasting change within communities.

—————-

Bonus Myth: “Social Value is just a passing trend”

Despite international trends where some governments prioritise economic growth over strong social policies, the UK is taking a distinct approach—embedding Social Value as a core part of procurement strategy rather than treating it as a passing trend.

With the Procurement Act 2023 shifting procurement decisions towards selecting the “most advantageous tender”—rather than simply the “most economically advantageous”—Social Value is becoming even more integral to procurement strategies.

The National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS) reinforces this commitment by prioritising the government’s missions in procurement, ensuring public spending delivers not just value for money but also tangible economic, social, and environmental benefits. The new Social Value Model requires that organisations bidding for public sector contracts actively contribute to these priorities, moving beyond simply meeting baseline contract requirements.

Therefore, with evolving legislation and increasing public demand, Social Value is here to stay and grow.

Social Value directly addresses the challenges facing our industry today, from workforce shortages and sustainability targets to inclusion and economic resilience. This presents a significant opportunity for organisations and individuals to play an active role in shaping positive outcomes. Whether through skills development, sustainable practices, or community engagement, think about how you can support Social Value objectives and advocate for these principles within your team to ensure they are embedded into everyday decision-making and project delivery.

References

PPN 002: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67ae1529e270ceae39f9e1a0/2025-02-11_PPN_002_The_social_value_model.docx.pdf

Article

Raising the profile of InterEngineering and supporting the LGBTQ+ community

- by
Tags: Featured

Article by Fiona Connor (Technical Associate, Hydrock now Stantec and Co-Chair of InterEngineering)

Originally, it was more luck than judgement that I found myself working in ground engineering, but I quickly realised when, fortunately, my graduate employer took a chance on my slightly atypical CV that it was the sector where I wanted to advance my career. I realised my passion is ground engineering. I’m fascinated by soil mechanics, earthworks and how geotechnical testing can best represent in situ conditions. I’ve worked hard in my career to excel and understand the intricacies of our complex field. However, starting off as a Geography graduate with a penchant for colouring in (A-level art, not physics!) with no engineering or even geology background, I’ve had to learn fast, learn a lot, and prove myself capable – as on paper I might not have been considered your ‘ideal graduate’

Back in 2014, I not only started my first graduate site role in geotechnical engineering, but I also reached a place of self-assurance with my sexuality and started dating women – specifically, my now partner. I soon reached the point of feeling I needed to come out to my colleagues, but I had no reference as to what that might be like, how to navigate this in a professional environment, and an environment where, at times, I already felt quite isolated.

Working as a graduate for a contracting firm in the ground engineering sector meant I was pretty much on a new site each week, sometimes with colleagues, mostly with subcontractors and agency staff, and regularly on general construction sites. I loved my job, but I’d already had to navigate and be resilient to an unacceptable amount of sexism. As a young female in a predominantly male dominated environment, in order to be seen and respected professionally, and to avoid sexism, the last thing that seemed like a good idea was to exacerbate my difference by opening up about being queer. Drawing attention to my sexuality, which, as a lesbian, tends to embolden some men to sexualise women, didn’t seem wise.

Fortunately, after some googling, I came across InterEngineering, a network for LGBTQ+ engineers. In 2016, I decided to attend one of their networking events. This allowed me to meet other LGBTQ+ engineers and feel a sense of community. It was valuable to hear I wasn’t alone in my experiences, to hear from people who were out at work in engineering with positive experiences, and hear how people had navigated more challenging environments was invaluable. It was the first time that I truly understood the importance of visible role models and community. I’m honestly unsure if I’d have stayed in the industry and been as assured of my place if it had it not been for the continual support and camaraderie provided by InterEngineering, and for other networks such as Bold As Brass.

InterEngineering is one of a wider group of networks within engineering, Networks – EqualEngineers which offer community and resource for a wide range of underrepresented groups.

What InterEngineering does:

  • Run summits and conferences, workshops and training, and webinars on various topics covering LGBTQ+ DEI.​
  • Participate in pride events, such as Pride in London, Birmingham and Manchester Prides, smaller, local pride events and UK Black Pride.​
  • Promote best practice through our library of publications and resources, and our workshops, webinars and speaking events.​
  • Work with a range of large organisations and SMEs, Professional Engineering Institutions, Academies, and other bodies such as the House of Commons.​

InterEngineering supports LGBTQ+ engineers informs allies by providing:

  • An aim to connect, inform, and empower LGBTQIA+ Engineers and supporters with our cross-discipline network across the UK.​
  • A safe space for engineers from organisations without internal ERGs or those not as advanced on their DEI journey.​
  • Resources on LGBTQ+ DEI to help promote good practice in Engineering.​
  • Opportunities to work, network, develop, and connect with LGBTQIA+ engineers and associated products, including mentoring opportunities.
  • An online community hub/network on the platform Circle. (https://bit.ly/EEInterEngineeringNetwork ).

Our rights and safety as LGBTQIA+ people are fundamentally hinged on political decision-making, with global powers hugely influential on the protection of anti-discrimination laws and policies.

Ten years ago, the UK seemed an optimistic place to be out and proud, with positive prospects of equal rights for the LGBTQIA+ community. It wasn’t perfect, but we were heading in the right direction. Same sex marriage had recently become law in England, Scotland and Wales. In ILGA-Europe’s 2015 review of LGBTI rights, the UK received the highest score in Europe, with 86% progress toward “respect of human rights and full equality” for LGBT people and 92% in Scotland alone.

By 2023, the UK had fallen to 17th place. When we look globally, we can see how easily hard-won rights can be revoked. The USA has significantly revoked Trans+ rights and LGBT+ education and support in schools, and fears of regression of many other areas of LGBTQ+ rights remain. Here in the UK, as I’m writing this article, a supreme court ruling has ruled against supporting trans+, non-binary and intersex rights and protections. Just this month, both Hungary and Georgia’s governments have moved to revoke LGBT+ rights. Trinidad and Tobago have also recriminalized gay sex – a move that will likely have wider implications across the Caribbean.

Once you’ve come out, there’s no going back. My visible profile of LGBTQ+ identity means I’d be cautious about travelling and working in regions where LGBTQ+ rights aren’t supported, with 65 nations still criminalising our community with lengthily jail sentences. At least 6 of these implement the death penalty – Iran, Northern Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Yemen – and the death penalty is a legal possibility in Afghanistan, Brunei, Mauritania, Pakistan, Qatar, UAE and Uganda. 14 nations also criminalise the gender identity and/or expression of transgender people.

The construction and engineering industries are tough. It is often stressful, people typically work long hours and spend time away from family, friends and loved ones. Colleagues and camaraderie play a big part of people’s coping mechanisms and resilience. Also, it’s important to consider that it might not be that your colleague who is LGBTQ+, it might be a partner, family member or friend. Ensuring colleagues feel comfortable to talk about LGBTQ+ identities with you can be incredibly valuable.

The Royal Academy of Engineering survey in 2023 suggests over a third of the workforce have witnessed LGBTQ+ discrimination in engineering, and that figure can rise to 100% when specifically considering the trans+ community. Within the workplace in general, one in ten Black, Asian and minority ethnic LGBT employees have been physically attacked by customers or colleagues in the last year, with nearly two in five bisexual people not out to anyone at work.

I’m conscious though my security in being able to be out at work came partially from privilege:

  • I came out as a young graduate employee already a secure job, no dependents, and wasn’t from a low-income background. If it didn’t go well, I didn’t have as much as some to lose.
  • I’ve been able to be selective the employers I’ve worked for since coming out, establishing they’ll likely be supportive prior to joining.
  • I’m also a cis woman, whose sexual orientation isn’t overtly obvious, so attitudes and potential hostilities on site are more likely to be because of sexism than homophobia.

That said, I’m not sure I’d be as confident to come out given the political and societal context today.

People remain in the closet because of:

  1. The fear of discrimination and bias: One of the primary reasons why LGBTQIA+ employees hesitate to come out at work is the fear of facing discrimination or bias from their colleagues or superiors.
  2. Lack of support: Without a supportive network, LGBTQIA+ employees may feel isolated and unsure if they can be their authentic selves at work. The absence of openly LGBTQIA+ role models or lack of awareness programs further exacerbates this situation.
  3. Lack of psychological safety: Creating an environment where employees feel safe and supported to come out is essential for fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace. Encouraging open dialogue and providing resources such as LGBTQIA+ affinity groups or support networks can go a long way in making employees feel valued and accepted.

Feedback from a recent study conducted by my InterEngineering Co-Chair, Poggy, that looked at discrimination of LGBTQ+ people in engineering showed:

  • Respondents reported a range of micro and macro aggressions, such as ‘discrimination passed off as banter’ to job rejections due to a ‘culture mismatch’, ‘blackmail’, and comments by colleagues ‘comparing LGBT to paedophiles and bestiality’.​
  • Discrimination becomes more ‘sophisticated’ with age and seniority – verbal abuse decreases whilst progression bias and blackmail increases with increased age and seniority.​

As a reminder, just because you may not ‘have a problem with the LGBTQ+ community’ it doesn’t mean that your colleagues know that. The media constantly bombards us with negative news and opinion articles on homophobic attacks across the country, how LGBTQ+ themes ‘aren’t appropriate to be taught in schools’, and how trans people are ‘threats to society’. The bombardment is endless, and so it’s no wonder people are still cautious and hesitant to bring their whole selves to work.

I support EDI in the workplace and volunteer as Co-Chair of InterEngineering not just because it’s something I enjoy, but because to me it’s a necessity. I find motivation in the knowledge that if just one person feels a little bit more comfortable in being out in the workplace – or can see it’s possible to succeed as a queer woman in construction or engineering – it’s been worthwhile.

Practical things you can do as an ally:

Senior leaders:

  • Have a think about if you’re willing to be an active ally to the LGBTQ+ community? Post positive statements made by your board supporting Pride – and ensure you then back them up by being a supportive employer!
  • Write an article on the company blog/intranet about being a visible ally.
  • Dedicate some training budget to diversity training for line managers or an LGBTQ+ awareness speaker.
  • Advocate, use your voice to amplify others, not just when it’s easy, but when it’s needed.

Line managers:

  • Have open and honest conversations with your team about personal experiences, you’d be surprised how impactful this can be (e.g., you’ve been up all night because you kid was sick, you’re anxious about something at work).
  • Be an active ally, speak openly about supporting LGBTQ+ rights, even just in passing conversation.

General staff:

  • Share things with your colleagues, ask to write blog or intranet post on things you’re passionate about, be that men’s mental health, periods in the workplace, juggling being a young parent whilst working in construction.
  • Run a toolbox talk on inclusive language or be openly supportive of LGBT+ rights. You never know how much impact a 2-minute conversation could have.
  • Call It Out, that ‘harmless joke’ or offhand comment? It matters. Challenge it.
  • Respect Boundaries, no one owes you a full explanation of their identity.
  • Listen & Learn – No assumptions, no prying, just an open mind.

You will always have those that ask, “What does it matter?”, “Why do you have to raise awareness of your sexuality or gender identity in the workplace?” “Why can’t we just be seen as ‘engineers’ irrespective of race, gender, disability or sexuality?”

Here’s the thing: we want that too! However, we’re still in a society where discrimination happens, where people feel that unless an inclusive culture is curated, they are not able to bring their whole selves to work. Inclusivity isn’t just the moral thing to do, either. A 2019 study by BetterUp found that improved workplace belonging can lead to an estimated:

  • 56% increase in job performance
  • 50% reduction in turnover risk
  • 75% decrease in employee sick days

Unless you are confident that I or anyone could walk on to your construction site or into your workplace and feel comfortable being completely open, no matter my gender or sexuality, then you still have things to improve.

Article

AGS Annual Conference 2025

- by

The AGS hosted its flagship event, the AGS Annual Conference, on 1st May 2024 at One Great George Street in London’s Westminster. It was a sell-out event for the association, with 240 delegates having registered to attend the full day event and evening networking reception.

Chaired by AGS Chair, Vivien Dent, the conference had seven guest presentations covering a range of geotechnical and geoenvironmental topics with an overarching theme of The Future. The AGS Working Group Leaders also provided short reports about their Working Groups from the past 12 months.

The conference showcased entries from the AGS’ Early Careers Professional Poster Competition on the theme Innovations in Your Line of Work, and invited the winner Luqman Ismail, to attend the event. Luqman’s winning entry looked at drone-based survey techniques and suggested that as technology evolves, so should the way we see the ground.

The event started with an opening introduction from AGS Chair, Viven Dent. Vivien took the opportunity to celebrate this year’s AGS Award Winners, in particular, Hugh Mallett who was awarded with a Lifetime Achievement Award for dedicating over 34 years of service to the AGS.

Dipalee Jukes (Co-Founder and Co-CEO at Ground & Water) opened the conference sharing her life experiences as an intersectional woman of colour, female leader and working mother in the industry. Her inspirational talk highlighted the challenges and successes she has faced over the years. This was followed by Jonathan Atkinson (Technical Director at CL:AIRE and Member of Land Condition Community at IES) who presented on how land condition faces a number of challenges in the future and some of the opportunities to develop sustainable practice through interdisciplinary collaboration and development of solutions.

After a refreshment break, Stephanie Bricker (Head of Urban Geoscience and Spatial Planning at British Geological Survey) explored the transformative Common Ground project and its impact on improving access to ground investigation data in the UK. Dr Jennifer Scoular (Head of Product at SatSense) looked at the evolving role of InSAR in geotechnical applications, from tracking unstable slopes and wide-area subsidence to high-resolution monitoring of critical infrastructure, and highlighted case studies demonstrating how InSAR complements traditional site investigation techniques.

Following lunch and networking opportunities, Luke Wilkinson (Principal Geo-Environmental Engineer at Soils) Chris Milne (Transportation Technical Lead – Geotechnics at Murphy Group) and James Blyth (Director at SoilSafe) presented on the challenges of obtaining accurate in-situ ground stiffness measurements and compared surface wave stiffness data with that obtained by other common techniques. This was followed by a presentation from Lin Harrington (Social Value Lead at WSP) on how WSP approaches social value from a ESG and project perspective, and explored some geoscience project case studies. Ben Gilson (Associate at Arup) gave the final presentation of the event which discussed the transformative potential of Generative AI within the field of ground engineering, covering the fundamentals of Generative AI, its uptake, and its impact on productivity.

Alex Lee, AGS Chair Elect wrapped up the conference and took the opportunity to thank Vivien Dent for the exceptional service and leadership that she has provided to the Association over the past two years as Chair. Her legacy has strengthened the association, its direction, collaboration and governance.

The Annual Conference concluded with a networking drinks and canapé reception in the Smeaton Room which gave guests the opportunity to catch up with friends and colleagues at their leisure.

It was a fantastic event that provided a valuable opportunity for industry professionals to come together, network, and share insights.

The AGS would like to take this opportunity to thank our speakers and sponsors including Soil Engineering, Igne, Eijkelkamp Fraste UK, Pebble Geo, SOCOTEC, Brimstone, Groundsure, Equipe, Huesker, Envirolab, BAM Ritchies, In Situ Site Investigation, AFITEXINOV UK, Geosense, Geotechnical Engineering, Landmark Geodata, i2 Analytical and Dr Sauer & Partners.

Article

AGS Photography Competition 2025

- by
Tags: Featured

The AGS is holding a new photography competition for 2025!

This year, we’re on the lookout for your most creative images that capture the essence of the geotechnical and geoenvironmental industry. Whether you’re an aspiring photographer or have a standout photo you’d like to share, we’d love to see it!

There are five different categories to enter with some excellent prizes up for grabs!

Technology in Geotechnical Engineering

  • Pictures showcasing depictions of innovative technologies such as geotechnical sensors, remote sensing, or drones used in data collection and monitoring.

Environmental and Sustainable Practices

  • Images should have a focus on environmentally sustainable geotechnical engineering practices, such as remediation work, or using eco-friendly materials.

People in Geosciences

  • We’re looking for images that focus on engineers, workers, and technicians in action, as well as collaborative working on site.

Geotechnical Landscape

  • These pictures should showcase stunning images of landscapes affected or shaped by geotechnical processes, such as soil erosion, slope stability work, or land reclamation.

Safety and Risk Management

  • Photographs demonstrating excellent safety measures, practices and risk mitigation strategies in the field, such as equipment usage, signage, and personal protective equipment.

Entry into the competition is free and the overall winner will receive a £100 Amazon voucher. There will also be five category winners who will each receive a runner up prize of an Amazon voucher worth £30.

There are no restrictions on the photography equipment used, so feel free to use a phone, computer, tablet or a traditional hand-held camera to capture your image as long as the below criteria are met.

All entries will be reviewed by select members of the AGS, who will decide on the winners. Full details will be announced later in the year.

IMAGE REQUIREMENTS

The AGS are looking for high resolution JPEG images (300 DPI / over 1MB image file size) of a geotechnical and geoenvironmental nature. Photographs featuring any on-site operatives should showcase health and safety procedures in place, if appropriate. Images should be no smaller than 4200 x 3400 pixels.

HOW TO ENTER
Please email your image with the following information to ags@ags.org.uk with the subject ‘AGS Magazine: Photography Competition 2025’ in the email.

  • A short description of what it showcases and where it was taken (up to 50 words)
  • Which category your image is for
  • Image credit information (if applicable)
  • Your full name
  • Company name

Please note that there is no limit to the number of images you enter and the deadline for entries is 25th July. Entry into the competition is free.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
• Applicants must be aged 18 or over.
• All images must be high resolution and 300 DPI (dots per inch) / over 1MB image file size.
• Applicants must be based in the UK.
• The photographer must have full copyright of all entered images and appropriate permissions from all involved parties, for all images submitted.
• All images entered may be reproduced by the AGS and used in future AGS event and marketing literature without prior notice. This may include usage across the AGS’ social media channels, inclusion in the AGS Magazine, event programmes and on the AGS website. Please note that all images used will be credited.

Article

Three Decades of Dedication: Hugh Mallett Retires with a Lifetime Achievement Award

- by
Tags: Featured

At the Annual Conference on 1st May in London, the AGS presented Hugh Mallett with a Lifetime Achievement Award to mark over 34 years of work, contributions and service to the Association.

Hugh attended his first AGS committee meeting in 1991 and was among the founding members of the Contaminated Land Working Group, which was established and chaired by Jan Hellings.

Over the years, he provided invaluable expertise and input to drive the AGS forward and make positive waves for the benefit of the geoscience industry. He served as AGS Chair from 2003 to 2005 and was the Leader of the AGS Loss Prevention Working Group for eight years, from 2014 to 2022.

Over the years, Hugh represented the AGS at numerous conferences including multiple AGS Annual Conferences and the AGS Commercial Risks and How to Manage Them Conferences (in 2019 and again 2020). He has also been a regular contributor across the AGS’ webinar programme, having presented at virtual events including, Commercial Risks and How to Manage Them: Basic Contractual Risk Mitigation in 2021, and Loss Prevention Guidance: What You Don’t Realise You Need To Know (2022 Updates) in 2023.

Hugh has made invaluable contributions to the AGS over the past three decades as an author, where he was written a range of publications, including AGS Magazine articles, Loss Prevention Alerts and client guides. He has also played a pivotal role in revision of the Loss Prevention Guidance (formerly known as the Loss Prevention Tool Kit) in 2017 and 2022. In 2023/2024, Hugh conducted a review of the Loss Prevention Alerts, working his way through over 70 alerts and identifying which ones needed updating or archiving.

AGS Chair, Vivien Dent, commented: “I’d like to thank Hugh for his dedication to the AGS over the last 3 decades. His hard work has left a lasting legacy and he will be greatly missed.”

We would like to take this opportunity to thank Hugh for his work and contributions, not just to the AGS, but to the geoscience industry as a whole. We wish him a long and happy retirement with his family and friends. Thank you, Hugh.

News

AGS Magazine: May 2025

- by
Tags: Featured

The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists is pleased to announce the May 2025 issue of their publication; AGS Magazine. To view the magazine click here.

This free, publication focuses on geotechnics, engineering geology and geoenvironmental engineering as well as the work and achievements of the AGS.

There are a number of excellent articles in this issue including;

• AGS Annual Conference: 2025 – Page 10
• AGS Data Conference – Page 18
• Raising the profile of InterEngineering and supporting the LGBTQ+ community – Page 26
• Debunking Social Value Myths: What It Is and Why It Matters – Page 34
• Monitoring of Turbidity within Groundwater during Piling Operations – Page 40
• Q&A – Mark Toye – Page 46

Plus much, much more!

Advertising opportunities are available within future issues of the publication. To view rates and opportunities please view our media pack by clicking HERE.

If you have a news story, article, case study or event which you’d like to tell our editorial team about please email ags@ags.org.uk. Articles should act as opinion pieces and not directly advertise a company. Please note that the publication of editorial and advertising content is subject to the discretion of the editorial board.

News Business Practice Contaminated Land Data Management Executive Geotechnical Instrumentation & Monitoring Loss Prevention Safety Sustainability

AGS Awards 2025

- by
Tags: Featured

We were delighted to announce this year’s AGS Award and Commendation Winners at the AGS Annual Conference, held at the One Great George Street in London on 1st May 2025.

Chosen from a select number of AGS Working Group Members, these Winners were all nominated by their Working Group Leader in testament to their hard work and dedication to the AGS over the past year.

A huge well done and thank you to the following Award and Commendation Winners:

AGS Loss Prevention Working Group
Tim White (Award Winner)
Syd Pycroft (Commendation)

AGS Safety Working Group
Jon Rayner (Award Winner)

AGS Geotechnical Working Group
Emma Bell (Award Winner)
Georgina Donbroski (Commendation)

AGS Data Management Working Group
Petra Lincoln (Award Winner)

AGS Contaminated Land Working Group
Barry Mitcheson (Award Winner)
Tim Rolfe (Commendation)

AGS Instrumentation & Monitoring Working Group
David Hutchinson (Award Winner)
Tim Clegg (Commendation)

AGS Sustainability Working Group
Marla Gillow (Award Winner)
Jai Shah (Commendation)

AGS Business Practice Working Group
Bradley Falcus (Award Winner)

AGS Executive
Chris Raison (Award Winner)

AGS Lifetime Achievement Award
Hugh Mallett

To view the montage of acceptance speeches from our Winners, just view the video below

Event

Geotechnical Engineering & Operations Expo (GEO Expo) and Contamination and Land Remediation Expo (CLR Expo)

Geotechnical Engineering & Operations Expo (GEO Expo) and Contamination and Land Remediation Expo (CLR Expo)
2025-09-172025-09-1817th Sep - 18th Sep 2025
NEC, Birmingham

Geotechnical Engineering & Operations Expo (GEO Expo) launches in 2025 as the premier event for professionals across the geotechnical sectors.

Whether you’re an engineering consultant, developer, contractor or an industry newcomer, GEO Expo offers the perfect platform to connect with global innovators, discover the latest trends, and source groundbreaking solutions for sustainable land development.

GEO Expo is set to be an event you don’t want to miss, featuring cutting-edge solutions, networking, expert-led sessions, lucrative investment opportunities, and crucial insights to elevate your operation.

The Contamination and Land Remediation Expo (CLR Expo) returns in 2025 as the premier event for professionals across the geoenvironmental sectors. Whether you’re a contractor, environmental consultant, engineer, policy maker or an industry newcomer, CLR offers the perfect platform to connect with global innovators, discover the latest trends, and source groundbreaking solutions for sustainable land development.

With over 3,000 attendees in 2024, CLR 2025 is set to be bigger and better than ever, featuring cutting-edge solutions, live demonstrations, expert-led sessions, lucrative investment opportunities, and crucial insights to elevate your operation.

Why Attend?
• Discover your next solution: Explore cutting-edge innovations, initiatives, technology and solutions in the geotechnical sector.
• Expert-Led Conferences: Gain valuable insights from keynote sessions and seminars designed to address industry challenges and provide actionable insights.
• Unparalleled Networking: Connect with peers, suppliers, consultants, and decision-makers driving land development forward across diverse sectors. Create powerful new partnerships to take your business to new heights.
• Comprehensive Solutions: Access a one-stop event for geotechnical and geoenvironmental solutions, offering everything from advanced technologies to actionable strategies.

GEO and CLR Expo are part of the Environmental Services & Solutions Expo (ESS Expo), the UK’s largest event dedicated to environmental services and technology. The Expo unites eight co-located shows, and one free ticket provides attendees with a unique, comprehensive platform to explore the latest advancements in resource, waste, land, water, energy, air quality, and everything in between:
• CLR – Contamination & Land Remediation Expo
• WWEM – Water, Wastewater & Environmental Management Expo
• RWM – Resource & Waste Management Expo
• EFD – Energy, Fuels & Decarbonisation Expo
• AQE – Air Quality & Emissions Expo
• GEO – Geotechnical Engineering and Operations Expo (New for 2025)
• CARS & MRE – Complete Auto Recycling Show & Metals Recycling Event (Co-located with ESS for the first time)

Find out more about GEO: https://hubs.la/Q03gkmGj0
Find out more about CLR: https://hubs.la/Q03gklv_0