Article

Response to ‘Thoughts from the regulatory front line: How can SiLCs and the NQMS help to get it right first time?

- by
Tags: Featured

This is the second of two articles developed by the SiLC Professional & Technical Panel (PTP) regarding the standard of land contamination reports submitted through the planning system. Here the authors respond to the quality issues raised by David Carr in AGS Magazine’s July 2024 issue and explain how SiLCs and the NQMS can help.

With increasing targets to build more houses to address the housing shortage in England and beyond, and a growing focus on developing brownfield sites first, getting land contamination reports right first time is critically important. Doing so will positively impact all parts of the sector by reducing costs and cutting time to get assessments approved by regulators, as well as enabling regulators to focus their time on the more complex sites and their wider duties.

In ‘Thoughts from the regulatory front line’, David Carr set out the most common issues with land contamination reports submitted to regulators, in particular that more effort is needed to meet the requirements of LCRM. George Baggott’s ‘Contaminated Land Reports for Planning – A Peer Review’, which was informed by his experience peer reviewing reports on behalf of several Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) in England echoed David’s findings.

There is also evidence from across the sector that the standard of land contamination reporting varies across the UK. The recent National Brownfield Forum (NBF) 2023/24 Sector Review Summary Report highlighted ‘a pervasive problem with the quality of reports submitted by consultants.’ Many reports were described as ‘minimum viable products, lacking in-depth analysis and leaving room for doubts about their conclusions. This often leads to prolonged back-and-forth communications to resolve issues’. Respondents had varying views on the quality and competence of land contamination advice being provided.

Like many current challenges, this is a multi-faceted issue. The SiLC Professional Technical Panel (PTP) has also been looking into the issue that many land contamination reports submitted under planning are not of sufficient quality to be accepted by LPAs without amendment. A Root Cause Analysis identified five key factors: a low bar for entry to the market; poor quality is not ‘punished’; developers procure on cost and speed rather than quality and value for money; acceptable standards are not well understood; and approvers can find they are out of their depth on more complex sites. A common factor is insufficient competency of those signing-off reports.

Focus is inevitably turning towards solutions. Some LPAs employ external peer reviewers to share the workload or provide access to additional technical expertise, with Suitably Qualified Person (SQP) qualification sometimes specified. Others benefit from the pooled resources of councils working together, for example Worcester Regulatory Services. With on-going budgetary pressures, some LPAs are reportedly considering charging developers on an hourly basis for planning consultations. A more drastic option being considered by some LPAs is to allow reports through without review should the submitting consultant hold sufficient Professional Indemnity insurance, however, this poses significant risks both of potential LPA liability and reputational damage should sites not be assessed or remediated adequately. On the other hand, high quality work can enhance reputation, provide citizens with confidence and expedite property transactions.

A suitable framework that provides a consistent approach to the quality of land contamination reports already exists in the National Quality Mark Scheme for land contamination (NQMS). The NBF Sector Review recognised this, but responses indicated that more should be done to widen its acceptance, particularly within the regulatory community.

Evidence-based risk assessments form the core of LCRM and supporting technical guidance, and the NQMS criteria are closely aligned to this. As part of the process, the SQP has to complete a form with the NQMS ‘Appendix 1’ criteria before signing the declaration of a report’s adequacy. The table below illustrates how the NQMS process can help address many of the common quality issues in reports that have been raised.

Quality issue How NQMS can help
Competency of those involved in collecting data. writing, assessing and technically reviewing reports Checking suitable competency for this is a mandatory element when SQPs are completing declarations under the NQMS.
The assessment needs to set out the applicable legal context (e.g. planning or Part 2A) and its specific aims and objectives. The NQMS ‘Appendix 1’ sign-off criteria require this be clearly set out along with confirmation of a robust data gathering, site investigation design and risk assessment given the legal context.
Bringing together complex, sometimes contradictory, data to inform the overall site assessment; the importance of developing and presenting the CSM, including uncertainties, and taking only relevant potential contaminant linkages through each risk assessment stage. These skills are among the SiLC criteria met by candidates qualifying as SiLC and SQP. The NQMS ‘Appendix 1’ sign-off criteria include confirmation that all information has been presented and summarised clearly and understandably.
Specific aspects to be considered at each phase, including historical land use data, justifying the scope and rationale of the investigation, justified use of statistics in QRA. These aspects and more form part of the NQMS ‘Appendix 1’, which has sign-off criteria for all reports and each report type.
Consideration of limitations and uncertainties in the assessment; for example no access to areas pre-demolition, and for all elements of remediation strategies. It is mandatory for NQMS reports to clearly highlight relevant uncertainties/ limitations along with the implications for any conclusions drawn. In the authors’ opinion, this is a key area of added value in NQMS reports.

In summary, the NQMS scheme has been designed and implemented to resolve common quality issues in reports and underlying factors, such as competency. These must be addressed during the sign-off process by the SQP. SiLC continues to audit NQMS annually and to apply any lessons to continually improve the scheme.

The NQMS is not intended to replace regulatory scrutiny but it can certainly help to get reports right first time. In fact, from a regulatory perspective, requesting use of the NQMS has no obvious drawbacks. It would push the costs for making sure these reports are adequate back to the planning applicant/ consultants before the reports reach the regulator. Reports that comply with the NQMS would reduce the regulator review time and ‘back-and-forth’ with consultants to address technical queries. By extension, this would also have a positive impact on the getting both brownfield and greenfield sites developed more quickly and safely, and would contribute to the pressing societal need to build more housing.

References
Carr,D. 2024. Thoughts from the regulatory front line. AGS Magazine, July 2024 pp 14-16
Baggott, G. 2024. Contaminated Land Reports for Planning – A Peer Review

Article by George Baggott, Associate Director, AECOM; Tom Henman, Director, RSK and past SiLC PTP Chair and Paul Nathanail, Director, LQM and past chair SiLC Board of Directors

Article Loss Prevention

The Procurement Act 2023

- by
Tags: Featured

The Procurement Act 2023 will come into force from February 2025 and it will change how public sector organisations procure services. If your work streams are based on such clients, you will probably have seen changes and requests for information where buyers are starting to implement compliance processes. If you are looking to become a supplier to such clients, then understanding the requirements of the Act will be essential, so that your business is ready. If you are unaware of and unprepared for the forthcoming changes, then your public sector work stream may be at risk.
There is plenty of information, including videos, from the Cabinet office, leader of the Transforming Public Procurement programme, on the gov.uk website.
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/transforming-public-procurement
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/procurement-act-2023-guidance-documents
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMln_FclCKM

Some of the benefits of the new regime include the following, but it is recommended that companies familiarise themselves with and understand the changes resulting from the Act, so they can position their businesses accordingly:
• a central platform to register and to store your core business details; for use in multiple bids;
• improved transparency and access to information. (All public procurement opportunities published in one place to simplify searching for procurements of interest);
• better visibility of procurement plans, engagement events and tender opportunities;
• greater visibility on details, bidders and winners of large public sector contracts (above £5 million);
• simplified bidding processes to make it easier to bid, negotiate and work in partnership with the public sector-including a new ‘competitive flexible’ procedure;
• more flexible frameworks, so prospective suppliers are not shut out for long periods of time;
• a new duty on contracting authorities to have regard to and try to overcome the particular barriers facing SMEs through the procurement life cycle (“levelling the playing field”);
• strengthened provisions for prompt payment throughout the supply chain (SMEs to benefit from 30-day payment terms on a broader range of public sector contracts); and
• a stronger exclusion system to take tougher action on underperforming suppliers.

Article Loss Prevention

Changes to Safety Schemes in Procurement (SSIP) Accreditation

- by
Tags: Featured

Recent changes to the Safety Schemes in Procurement reflect a growing emphasis on social value and Legal, Compliance, Risk, and Management issues. SSIP accreditation, traditionally focused on health and safety standards within the supply chain, is now evolving to incorporate broader social value considerations. This shift underscores the importance of ethical practices, environmental sustainability, and community impact in procurement processes.

Social value in SSIP accreditation involves evaluating how organizations contribute positively to society. This includes commitments to environmental sustainability, promoting diversity and inclusion, and supporting local communities. Organizations seeking SSIP accreditation will need to demonstrate their initiatives in these areas, showcasing how their operations generate social benefits beyond mere compliance with safety standards.

Legal, Compliance, Risk, and Management issues are also receiving enhanced attention. Companies must ensure they meet legal requirements, adhere to compliance standards, and effectively manage risks. This includes thorough documentation, regular audits, and proactive risk management strategies. Integrating Legal, Compliance, Risk, and Management into SSIP accreditation ensures that organizations maintain high ethical standards, minimize legal risks, and foster a culture of transparency and accountability.

These changes in SSIP accreditation reflect a holistic approach to procurement, recognizing that organizational success and social responsibility are intertwined. By addressing social value and Legal, Compliance, Risk, and Management issues, SSIP accreditation aims to promote a sustainable, ethical, and legally compliant supply chain.

AGS members, particularly SME companies that may not have taken Legal, Compliance, Risk, and Management or social values issues into account before, should be aware of these changes before they are required to produce evidence for accreditation purposes.

Article provided by Murray Bateman, Director, Geo-Integrity Ltd

Article Loss Prevention Sustainability

Carbon Net Zero Reporting Requirement for AGS members

- by
Tags: Featured

The UK government has set a target to achieve carbon net zero by 2050, compelling businesses to drastically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. To support this, larger companies are required to disclose their environmental impact through frameworks such as the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Companies with over 250 employees, annual turnovers exceeding £36 million, or balance sheets over £18 million must comply, reporting their energy use, carbon emissions, and sustainability strategies. This reporting covers Scope 1, direct emissions from fuel use, Scope 2, indirect emissions from electricity use, and Scope 3, business travel. TCFD also requires companies to disclose the financial risks to their business from climate change and decarbonisation.

These regulations are expected to extend to smaller companies as the UK intensifies its climate action. By the mid-2020s, medium-sized enterprises may also be required to report on their carbon footprints and implement sustainability measures. This expansion will affect members of the AGS, as they will need to adopt comprehensive environmental management practices and increase transparency in their operations.

Early compliance and proactive adaptation will be essential for AGS members. They will need to invest in cleaner technologies and enhance their sustainability initiatives to align with the upcoming regulations. This shift not only helps in meeting regulatory requirements but also positions these companies competitively in a market increasingly driven by environmental consciousness and sustainability.

Article provided by Murray Bateman, Director, Geo-Integrity Ltd

Article Loss Prevention

Survey of AGS members

- by
Tags: Featured

In June last year the AGS Loss Prevention Working Group undertook a survey of AGS members, requesting comments on their recent and current commercial, contractual and legal issues which have affected their organisations in the past 12 months. 17 comments were received which covered a variety of topics.

The members of the LPWG would like to thank all those who submitted their comments. The working group are currently reviewing these comments, and will use them to help guide the LPWG in their choice of topics for future work, including producing Magazine articles and guidance documents.

Six comments were made on issues regarding Professional Indemnity Insurance and cap on liability, in particular the level of PI insurance cover requested, and the ability to obtain such cover at reasonable rates.

Three comments were made on issues regarding the requests from clients for Reassignment and Collateral Warranties, such as unlimited reassignments.

There were two comments about CDM. These related to whether the organisations being requested by the client to be the Principal Contractor were the appropriate organisations to undertake that role and were competent to do so.

Six other comments were received regarding issues relating to the general trading situation. These covered Government u-turns, slow planning decisions, lack of information, increased risk, shorter programmes, increased overheads, insolvency of other companies in the project, overall project management issues, and pay when paid clauses.

Article Business Practice Contaminated Land Data Management Executive Geotechnical Instrumentation & Monitoring Laboratories Loss Prevention Safety Sustainability

Early Careers Poster Competition 2025

- by

The AGS Early Careers Poster Competition is returning for a second year, this time with a new theme of workplace innovations.

This year, we’d like to see examples of innovations in your line of work designed into a captivating and eye-catching poster. Examples could include using remote sensing, incorporating Artificial Intelligence into projects, adopting innovative ground investigation techniques or practicing unique innovations in digital technology.

The poster should be colourful, eye-catching and aim to inspire businesses to become more innovative.

The winner will receive a Selfridges hamper worth approximately £100, free entry to attend the Annual Conference and Networking Reception on Thursday 1st May in London, plus have their poster and an accompanying article printed in AGS Magazine, which reaches over 6,600 industry professionals 6 times a year.

All posters submitted will be printed and displayed at the Annual Conference.

To enter, email your A4 poster alongside your full name and company to ags@ags.org.uk. Entry closes on Friday 11th April at 9pm.

ENTRY INFORMATION

Posters should be submitted in a high resolution (300dpi), A4 format and can be created by any means, from drawing by hand, utilising photography, to computer-generated artwork.

Entrants should have no more than 10 years industry experience.

Please note that all submitted posters will be printed and displayed at the AGS Annual Conference.

To enter, please email your poster alongside your full name and company to Caroline Kratz at ags@ags.org.uk with the subject title ‘AGS Poster Competition’. The deadline for entries is Friday 11th April at 9pm.

ABOUT THE AGS ANNUAL CONFERENCE

The Annual Conference is the flagship event in the AGS’ calendar. Taking place on 1st May 2025 at One Great George Street in London, the event will see over 240 geotechnical and geoenvironmental professionals in attendance.

This year’s Annual Conference has an overarching theme of the future and the AGS will be donating a percentage of profits made to Projects for Nature, an initiative which aims to restore nature recovery in the UK.

For further information and to register click HERE or email ags@ags.org.uk

Article Safety

A New Dawn: Renewed collaboration between the BDA and AGS to improve Health and Safety across the Geotechnical Industry

- by
Tags: Featured

The British Drilling Association (BDA) Health and Safety Sub-Committee and the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) Safety Working Group have announced a renewed collaboration that will see them once again working together to improve health, safety and wellbeing in the ground investigation industry.

Members of the AGS and BDA met in London on 5th November and an incredibly positive outcome was achieved. It was agreed that in January 2025, representatives from each organization will sit on both BDA Health and Safety Committee and AGS Safety Working Group meetings, with the aim of sharing knowledge and expertise to ensure a joint approach is taken to industry guidance and practice.

Paul Breslin, Chair of the BDA Health and Safety Committee, spoke enthusiastically about the collaboration, stating, “I am delighted that this partnership between the BDA Health and Safety Committee and AGS Safety Working Group has been renewed. By working together, we can ensure that the highest standards of health and safety is embedded across the industry. This collaboration is a significant step forward for the industry and will support both our missions to promote a safe and healthy working environment for all those who work in the sector. By sharing best practices and aligning industry guidance, the two organisations are paving the way for a safer, more secure future for the industry”.

Elizabeth Withington, Chair of the AGS Safety Working Group, welcomed the renewed collaboration, commenting that “Safety is at the core of everything we do in the industry. By the AGS and BDA working closely together there will be a deep understanding of all activities in the sector , helping to keep everyone from the newest operative to the seasoned HSE manager safe”.

As the industry prepares for this new era of collaboration, stakeholders can look forward to a unified approach that prioritises the wellbeing of all those involved in geotechnical and geoenvironmental work. With the BDA and AGS once again joining forces, a brighter future for health and safety in the industry is on the horizon.

Article

The UK’s largest community of construction industry ambassadors returns to London Build Expo on November 20th & 21st

- by
Tags: Featured

London Build, the UK’s leading and largest construction show will be back at Olympia London this November and this year it is doubling in size, taking over both the Grand & National Halls. Get ready for an unmissable two-days jam-packed with incredible content, networking parties, the UK’s biggest Festival of Construction and more. The show is co-located with London Build Fire & Security Expo.

Each year London Build works with an inspiring diverse team of Ambassadors to drive change in the UK’s built environment, supporting Women in Construction, Diversity in Construction, Mental Health and Sustainability. This year this program has grown, with the launch of new programs for Digital Construction Innovators and Fire Safety in Construction Ambassadors.

With free-to-attend networking events held for each of the communities at London Build 2024, attendees will get the opportunity to network and connect with Ambassadors in person. Don’t miss out on your chance to  network and connect with 35,000+ construction professionals from across the UK’s built environment, with attending companies including Mace, WSP, Turner and Townsend, Gensler, Balfour Beatty, AECOM, Keltbray, Broadway Malyan, Wates, Multiplex, John Sisk, Mott MacDonald, Galliford Try, ISG, Arup and more.

DATES FOR YOUR DIARY:

  • Mental Health in Construction Meetup (Nov 20th, 1:45 PM) – Co-hosted with Movember
  • Sustainability Professionals Forum (Nov 20th, 3:00 PM) – Co-hosted with UK Green Building Council
  • Meet the UK’s Digital Construction Gurus (Nov 21st, 12:30 PM) – Cohosted with nima
  • Annual Diversity in Construction Networking Event (Nov 21st, 1:45 PM) – Co-hosted with Beyond Equality
  • UK’s Largest Networking Event for Women in Construction (Nov 21st, 3:30 PM) – Co-hosted with Modern Women, NAWIC, WISH and Women in BIM

This year’s London Build Ambassadors include:

“Having first visited the London Build Expo two years ago, I was blown away by the engaging conversations and the vibrant atmosphere. I am excited to contribute to the ongoing success of this event and am fully committed to helping foster meaningful connections and drive positive change in our industry.” – Katie Barrett, EDI & Social Value Manager – J.McCann

“I am excited to once again be part of the ambassador’s program for London Build 2024, with this being my 3rd year in a row participating and supporting this amazing program. The ambassador’s program provides the participant with an opportunity to be a catalyst for education, awareness and change over the various Stages at London Build, giving the participant the opportunity to be part of a topic or issue they are truly passionate about, which for me over the three years of my being an ambassador has been Diversity and Inclusion. I encourage others in the Industry to participate in this rewarding program.”  – Will Smith, President & CEO – Knightsbridge Development Corporation

“I am incredibly honoured and thrilled to be selected as an ambassador for the Diversity in Construction programme. This opportunity allows me to actively contribute towards creating a more inclusive and diverse construction industry, and I am fully committed to making a lasting impact. Together, we can break barriers and build a brighter future for all.” – Eliot Godley, Account Director – CBRE

“I am thrilled to be an Ambassador for London Build 2024. In a year where we have experienced many changes and challenges, I look forward to having discussions on how we continue to bring the industry forward and practical solutions on how we address current issues.”  – Daisie Barnett, Policy Development Manager – CIOB

“I am absolutely thrilled to be named an ambassador for Women in Construction at the London Build Expo 2024. This initiative is close to my heart, as a founder of my own Women in ConTech group, I am passionate about creating a supportive community where women can share, learn, and grow together. I look forward to further championing diversity and inclusion, helping to open doors for more women to succeed in construction.” – Lucy Wright, Head of ConTech – Beaumont Bailey

Want to show your support and get involved as a London Build Ambassador? Submit your application at: www.londonbuildexpo.com/ambassador-programme

About London Build Expo:

The UK’s leading and largest construction show will take over both Grand & National Halls at Olympia London on November 20th and 21st, 2024. This year the expo will be co-located with the London Build Fire & Security Expot. Register for your free ticket today to gain access to 450+ exhibitors showcasing the latest technologies, 700+ speakers across 12 CPD-accredited stages, 35,000+ registered attendees, endless networking parties, Meet the Buyers, DJ, live music, entertainment and more!

20th Nov (Wed): 9:30 am – 5:30 pm

21st Nov (Thurs): 9:30 am – 5:00 pm

Venue: Olympia London – Grand and National Halls, Hammersmith Rd, London W14 8UX

Email contact: rosy@oliverkinrossevents.com

Article Sustainability

Implementing systemic sustainability: reducing single use plastic with core liner recycling

- by
Tags: Featured

Sustainability has become one of the most important factors to consider in any construction project, both within and outside of the ground engineering sector. The past few years have seen environmental and sustainability issues thrust into the spotlight on a global scale, including a more widespread understanding of governing bodies such as the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the UNFCCC COP), and large-scale adoption of initiatives such as the science based targets initiative (SBTi) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

However, focus on improving sustainability in construction is largely focussed on the introduction of practices that include ‘easy wins’ such as electric or alternatively fuelled equipment and fleet vehicles, the use of lower-impact materials, and an increased focus on renewable energy procurement. But what about everything else? While these aspects are undoubtedly hugely important in achieving sustainability goals, there are so many other ways in which sustainability can be achieved across the entire lifecycle of a project.

At Fugro, we continuously rethink what we do and how we do it to ensure we are key contributors to the development of a safe and liveable world. We conduct our operations in many different sectors and such a broad scope of works has leant itself to the development of a number of innovative ways to increase sustainability in these areas.

Targeting problematic plastic use

Post-Covid, Fugro decided to analyse how we could be more sustainable in lesser considered areas, and we began this process by analysing consumption across the business. We soon realised that we consume a large amount of single use plastic, and it was here that we decided to introduce our Zero Plastic Initiative, aiming to completely eliminate Fugro-deployed single use plastics and to reduce supply chain plastics by 50%.The single use plastic dilemma has become one of the most prominent environmental crises in recent times and the impact of single use plastics on our planet is devastating. Microplastics from waste that has been carelessly disposed of are everywhere, having been found in human blood, in clouds, and even at the bottom of the Mariana Trench, one of the deepest oceanic trenches on earth that stretches further below the surface of the sea than Everest does above land. Chemicals from plastics pollute soils and waterways. The production of virgin plastics includes the use of fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas and is incredibly energy intensive, with a white paper by The Association of Plastic Recyclers[i] estimating that virgin plastic production can consume an estimated 70.4 MJ per kg of energy.

Whilst Fugro endeavour to encompass all 17 sustainable development goals wherever possible, we most closely align ourselves with:

  • 7 – affordable and clean energy
  • 9 – industry, innovation and infrastructure
  • 11 – sustainable cities and communities
  • 14 – life below water
  • 15 – life on land

The manner in which Fugro was consuming plastics did not correspond with the objectives we believed we could best contribute to, nor did it resonate with the operational standards to which we aspire. With a strong determination to make the most substantial impact from the very beginning, we made the decision to tackle the most significant source of single-use plastic within our business operations first – the core liners.

Use of PVC core liners in our operations

The proper handling of waste stands as one of our most significant environmental responsibilities. PVC core liners are the most appropriate type of liner for carrying out our specific sample collection activities. Many of the projects in which we are involved present constraints related to space or weight. This is true whether we are drilling for core samples from a vessel situated in the middle of the North Sea or operating halfway up a mountain in the Scottish Highlands, as we did in 2023 as part of the SSE Renewables Coire Glas hydro pumped storage project.

There are numerous benefits to using PVC core liners, which play a crucial role in our geotechnical investigation works. Although they may seem like just simple plastic tubes, they offer significant cost savings and reduced weight compared to other options, they are durable, and because they are made from PVC rather than uPVC, they have the added advantage of flexibility. Their use helps reduce the risk of contamination, their transparency allows for easy observation, and they facilitate successful sample retrieval.

Whilst alternatives such as steel Shelby liners exist, they are significantly heavier and more expensive, and pose additional extraction risks when the sample is analysed in the laboratory. It is important to note that plastic itself is not inherently a bad choice – when used appropriately and handled correctly, plastic-based tools and parts can be invaluable in any geotechnical project. Therefore, completely phasing out the use of PVC core liners in favour of non-plastic alternatives was deemed unfeasible.

However, there is a notable downside to employing plastic core liners. Reuse, the subsequent tier in the waste management hierarchy, is unfeasible in this scenario. Upon arrival at our laboratories, the sample retrieval process necessitates the splitting of the liner, either partially or entirely, to extract the sample intact. Consequently, the liner cannot be reused and must be discarded. Our analysis of single-use plastic usage revealed that we were not handling this waste in the most environmentally responsible manner. Instead of implementing the recycle tier of the waste management hierarchy, we were resorting to the final tier, disposal/recovery.

Searching for a solution to recycle responsibly

We realised that it was imperative to instigate positive change, aligning with our commitment to support the SDGs and our sustainability objectives. However, we soon realised that finding a solution for PVC core liner disposal would prove to be a challenge.

The plastic recycling market predominantly favours easier to recycle plastics with higher rebate potential. uPVC (unplasticised polyvinyl chloride), commonly used in windows and doors, exemplifies this trend. In contrast, PVC (polyvinyl chloride) contains plasticising additives, rendering it somewhat malleable and structurally flexible, which is advantageous in certain applications but also presents challenges. These additives, such as phthalates, pose health hazards and contamination risks during recycling processes. Moreover, the high heat treatment typically involved in plastic recycling can release hydrochloric acid, posing corrosion risks to both equipment and workers. Many recycling companies are reluctant to bear the safety burden and associated costs relating to this.

In 2023, Simplas PVC Recycling embraced collaboration with us to realise our objectives. Aligned with Fugro’s values and vision, Simplas is committed to fostering more sustainable practices and reducing reliance on single-use plastics. Their dedication led to the attainment of Recovinyl® certification,  European certification scheme which verifies the process, quantity and quality of recycling PVC waste.

A secondary challenge lay in the requirement for cleaning prior to recycling, presenting another substantial obstacle due to the various mud and silt residues often stuck to the liners, as well as tapes and labels. Despite recognising the impracticality of cleaning them solely through manual labour, we remained determined to succeed. Through collaborative efforts among our internal departments, we pinpointed ultrasonic cleaning as the solution to achieve the cleanliness necessary to meet our objectives. Subsequently, we invested in two ultrasonic baths and crafted a tailored operating procedure, seamlessly integrating routine core liner cleaning into our daily operations.

PVC undergoes recycling via a mechanical process involving rigid plastic granulation. Initially, the core liners are shredded into pieces roughly a few inches in size. Subsequently, these pieces undergo a secondary processing phase, granulating them into even smaller fragments, typically just a few millimetres in size. Known as plastic pellets or ‘regrinds’ within the plastic recycling sector, these granules are ideally sized for sale to manufacturers of plastic goods. Manufacturers go on to melt the regrind to create new plastic items, avoiding the use of virgin PVC in manufacturing processes. While regrinds are often utilised in producing similar items, lower quality regrinds may also find applications in alternative products such as mats and traffic cones.

What’s the result?

All this effort brings considerable positive environmental benefit. Recycling PVC reduces primary energy demand by between 45% and 90% compared to virgin PVC production, resulting in approximately 2 kg of CO2 saved per kg of recycled material[ii]. Further carbon savings can be achieved by diverting this waste from incineration – the combustion of PVC in energy from waste facilities emits around 21.28 kg CO2 per tonne[iii].

To put this into perspective, Fugro disposes of around 4 tonnes of spent core liners annually, meaning that by simply working to ensure we recycle this waste stream we can save an additional 8.09 tonnes of CO2 from being emitted each year – it would take approximately 400 trees a year’s worth of growth to sequester the same amount of carbon dioxide from the atmosphereiii. There are other notable benefits in addition to the obvious carbon savings. Recycling core liners diminishes the demand for natural resources, with the makeup of PVC comprising of 57% chlorine extracted from common salt and 43% ethylene sourced from fossil fuels or byproducts from sugar crops[iv].

Although various factors can make systemic sustainability challenging, Fugro’s core liner recycling project serves as compelling evidence that with steadfast willpower and determination, these challenges can be realistically and effectively addressed.

Plans for the future

We are committed to going beyond the initial success of our core sample recycling initiative – our next objective is to initiate the recycling of the poly bags and tubs used to store samples in our laboratories, of which we go through approximately 20,000 of these items annually. Our efforts will continue to extend further down the single-use plastic chain, encompassing every item, right down to the very last sample tag and zip tie.

Finally, we must ensure that we share best practice and lessons learned with those around us. Fugro operate in 57 countries across the world and our international colleagues often encounter similar issues around plastic recycling. By delivering tangible benefits and laying the foundation for enduring change, we can amplify and maximise the environmental benefits of such approaches across our global portfolio.

But why stop there? Engagement with clients, geotechnical specialists, and other stakeholders around the single use plastic crisis is critical to ensuring the ground engineering sector can fully realise the benefits of adopting a circular economy approach. The industry as a whole need to make sure that we continue on a path of true sustainability, using open communication and knowledge sharing to ensure that a combination of effective techniques are used. This allows the industry to achieve the best environmental outcomes operationally, benefitting not only ourselves but the planet too, and most importantly, ensuring a safe and sustainable environment for future generations.

[i] Source: https://plasticsrecycling.org/images/library/APR-Recycled-vs-Virgin-May2020.pdf

[ii] Source: https://www.vinylplus.eu/news/moving-the-pvc-industry-to-a-low-carbon-circular-economy/#:~:text=It%20has%20been%20calculated%20that,PVC%20and%20the%20recycling%20process

[iii] Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/government-conversion-factors-for-company-reporting

[iv] Source: https://www.bpf.co.uk/plastipedia/polymers/PVC.aspx#Raw%20Materials

Article provided by Rachael Findlay, Environmental Adviser at Fugro

Information correct at date of writing, some operational elements of this scheme may be subject to change.

Image credit: Fugro

Article Loss Prevention

Post Brexit changes in environmental law and how it might affect AGS members

- by
Tags: Featured

A recent presentation to the SiLC Annual Forum by environmental solicitor Emma Tattersdill (Bexley Beaumont)covered the The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL Act), and in particular its possible implications for environmental law in the UK.

The REUL Act is a significant legislative measure in the United Kingdom, passed to address the complexities and legal frameworks inherited from European Union law post-Brexit. This Act is crucial for environmental law as it signifies a pivotal shift in how environmental regulations will be managed and implemented in the UK.

The REUL Act creates powers for government to review, amend, or repeal the vast body of EU-derived legislation retained in UK law after Brexit. Currently, the UK’s environmental law heavily relies on regulations directly imposed by the EU or influenced by EU directives. These laws covered various environmental protections, including air and water quality, waste management, biodiversity, and chemical safety.

The primary importance of the REUL Act in environmental law lies in its aim to streamline and adapt these inherited regulations to better fit the UK’s specific needs and priorities. By doing so, it provides an opportunity for the UK government to tailor its environmental policies more closely to national interests. However, this also poses significant challenges and uncertainties.

One of these challenges is the potential for a reduction in environmental standards. Critics argue that the process of reviewing and possibly revoking EU-derived laws could lead to the weakening of crucial environmental protections. For instance, there is apprehension that the government might prioritize economic and industrial interests over environmental sustainability, leading to less stringent regulations on pollution and resource management, such as they did with neonicotinoids in 2023. This could undermine the progress made in areas such as climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and public health protection.  Other concerns are that it may compromise the clarity, accessibility, and comprehensibility of “assimilated law”, thereby affecting the rule of law.  In addition, previously litigated points may need to be revisited due to the changes in the status of REUL; i.e. points argued under direct effect of EU Directives.  Also, to date the review process for which laws will be retained, amended, or repealed has been opaque and under resourced, to say the least, and with the recent change in government it is even less clear as to what will occur.

In conclusion, the REUL Act is a fundamental development in UK environmental law, representing both significant opportunities and potential risks. The implementation of the new Act has the ability to affect AGS members greatly.  For further information on the Act and

its ramifications, the UK Environmental Law Association has produced a fascinating briefing paper on their website (www.ukela.org).

Article provided by Murray Bateman, Director, Geo-Integrity Ltd

Article Business Practice

The Importance of Employee Networks: Empowering Diversity and Inclusion

- by
Tags: Featured

Employee Networks, are voluntary, employee-led groups formed around shared characteristics or experiences, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or veteran status. These networks have become essential in fostering diversity, inclusion, and a positive organizational culture. As businesses increasingly prioritize diversity and inclusion (D&I), the role of Employee Networks has grown in significance, offering numerous benefits for both employees and organizations.

Employee Networks are beneficial not only to the members but also to the organization as a whole. They offer a channel through which employees can voice their concerns, provide feedback on company policies, and contribute to a more inclusive workplace culture. Additionally, they serve as a resource for organizations to tap into diverse perspectives, which can drive innovation and improve decision-making.

The Benefits of Employee Networks

Employee Networks are vital for promoting a sense of belonging among employees, especially those from underrepresented groups. These networks help foster a supportive community by connecting individuals with similar backgrounds or interests. A 2019 study by Harvard Business Review found that companies with active Employee Networks are 70% more likely to have a positive organizational culture that promotes diversity and inclusion. These networks also play a crucial role in enhancing employee engagement, a key driver of productivity and retention.

Studies show that companies who embed Employee Networks within their EDI strategy, have a higher level of engagement in employees who participate in the groups. This demonstrates the significant role these networks play in retaining talent, particularly in a competitive job market. Employees who feel connected and valued are more likely to stay with the company and contribute to its success.

Driving Innovation Through Diverse Perspectives

Employee Networks also contribute to innovation by bringing diverse perspectives into the organization’s decision-making processes. Diverse teams are more likely to generate creative solutions and better understand the needs of a diverse customer base.

This connection between diversity and innovation is vital in industries where creativity is key. By leveraging the insights of a diverse workforce through Employee Networks, companies can stay ahead of the competition and drive continuous innovation.

Fostering a Culture of Inclusion

Employee Networks are instrumental in fostering a culture of inclusion, where all employees feel valued and respected. Inclusion is more than just diversity; it involves creating an environment where diverse voices are heard, considered, and integrated into the decision-making process. Employee Networks play a crucial role in advocating for inclusive policies and practices within the organization.

It’s noted that organizations with active Employee Networks are much more likely to have inclusive workplace policies, such as flexible work arrangements, diversity training, and equitable pay practices. These policies directly contribute to a more inclusive workplace, which in turn leads to higher levels of satisfaction and retention.

Supporting Career Development

Employee Networks also provide valuable opportunities for professional development and career advancement. Many networks offer mentorship programs, leadership development workshops, and networking events that help members build their skills and advance their careers. This is particularly beneficial for employees from underrepresented groups, who may face additional challenges in navigating their career paths.

Starting an Employee Network

No matter the business size, Employee Networks can be set up and run by dedicated and passionate staff members. Some examples of Employee Networks are listed: Women’s Networks, Black Employee Networks, Disability Networks, LGBTQ+ Networks, Asian Affinity Networks, Family Networks, and Volunteer Activity Networks. There are many more examples and one case won’t fit all. In the first instance, it’s good practice to confirm the general demographic of the workforce or if there is an appetite for a Network – this is where HR representative(s) should be involved to help shape the look of any future Network.

It’s also important to seek the support of a Champion or Executive Sponsor who is part of the company’s Senior Leadership Team, these will help open doors when you first start the Network. It’s essential to ensure that you engage volunteers to lead and participate in the Employee Network. You can attract volunteers by using the Network as a development opportunity and adding it to annual objectives and development plans.

The first step of any Employee Network should be to create an action plan with three main goals, prove the Network’s worth with these goals before expanding the remit, and reach – and manage expectations appropriately. Research similar employee networks within your own business or externally. Establish a dedicated committee of volunteers to help with initiatives and events. Use internal and external communication channels to cascade information through the company so employees feel part of a community year-round.

Conclusion

In today’s increasingly diverse and globalized workforce, the importance of Employee Networks cannot be overstated. These networks are not just a “nice-to-have” but a strategic asset that can drive organizational success. From enhancing employee engagement and retention to fostering innovation and inclusion, Employee Networks offer tangible benefits that contribute to a more vibrant, equitable, and productive workplace.

Organizations that invest in supporting and expanding their Employee Networks are not only supporting their employees but are also positioning themselves for long-term success in a competitive and rapidly changing environment. By recognizing and harnessing the power of Networks, companies create a workplace where diversity is celebrated, inclusion is the norm, and every employee has the opportunity to thrive.

Article provided by Bradley Falcus, Senior Administrator, Central Alliance

Article

The importance of task-specific asbestos awareness training

- by
Tags: Featured

In the specialized field of ground engineering, where workers frequently interact with made ground and disturb soils, the likelihood of encountering and associated risks with asbestos exposure are well documented. Whilst dangerous levels of exposure to asbestos are infrequent in the ground engineering world, knowledge of what form that asbestos could take and what that actually looks like in the ground could be the difference between a legal or illegal activity or creating a significant risk.

Hopefully, Asbestos Awareness Training (AAT) forms a part of most company’s training programmes, however, this training is often failing to fulfil the requirements of the Health and Safety Executive’s provided expectations as it is often not relevant to the work activity or workplace. This means that many in the industry receive only generic asbestos training, which often fails to address the specific hazards faced by ground engineering workers and the risk posed by asbestos in soils.

Asbestos awareness training, which is stipulated for “anyone who is liable to disturb asbestos during their normal work, or who supervises those employees” under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, is designed to cover the basics: types of asbestos, health risks, legal responsibilities, and general procedures for avoiding exposure. While crucial for a broad audience across the construction industry, this training often falls short for those in ground engineering, a sector that involves complex interactions with potentially contaminated soils, made ground, imported materials and buried infrastructure. Even despite the HSE’s guidance on who should undertake AAT, statistics from the last 12 months of the British Drilling Association’s annual driller’s audit show that 12% of their participants hold no asbestos training whatsoever.

Ground engineering frequently takes place on brownfield sites where asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) may be present on or beneath the surface. Generic training often focusses on asbestos in buildings and what it looks like within buildings, like pipe lagging or ceiling tiles, which does not adequately prepare workers for the challenges posed by asbestos risks associated with demolition, weathering, crushing etc. The skills required to identify potential asbestos-contaminated soil during excavation, for example, are vastly different from those used in dealing with asbestos insulation in buildings.

This gap in training can lead to dangerous lapses in safety protocols, as workers may be unaware of how to recognize and handle asbestos risks unique to their work environments.

Why does AAT need to be task-specific?

The HSE guidance on AAT makes specific reference to the training being “appropriate for the work and the roles undertaken by each worker (and supervisor)”. This means task-specific asbestos awareness training for ground engineering workers should be undertaken to address the unique risks and challenges faced on ground engineering sites. By offering in-depth knowledge and practical guidance tailored to the specific activities and environments they encounter, learners can be better equipped in how to identify potential asbestos and know what the immediate next steps are.

A key focus of task-specific training is the identification and assessment of asbestos hazards. Ground engineering workers must be able to recognize potential ACMs not just in buildings, but in soil and other subsurface conditions, as well as its potential presence on the surface. This requires an understanding of how asbestos was historically used, disposed of, and how it might have spread over time.

For instance, asbestos was commonly used in products like cement pipes and drainage systems. When these materials are buried or broken up, they can pose significant risks to workers who may unknowingly disturb them as part of a ground investigation, or wider earthworks projects. Task-specific training equips workers with the knowledge to identify these risks and raise the alarm.

What are the benefits?

Task-specific asbestos awareness training offers several key benefits. First and foremost, it enhances worker safety by providing the knowledge and skills necessary to identify and avoid potential asbestos exposure in specific ground engineering environments such as ground investigations, earthworks, piling, land drilling, remediation etc. This not only protects individual workers but also contributes to a safer workplace culture, where everyone is aware of the risks and takes proactive steps to mitigate them.

Secondly, it helps employers comply with their legal obligations under the Control of Asbestos Regulations, 2012. By providing training that reflects the specific risks of their work and their working environments, employers can demonstrate due diligence and eliminate the risk of fines or legal action in the event of an asbestos-related incident.

Finally, task-specific training can lead to improved project outcomes. When workers are confident in their ability to identify asbestos risks in soils, this allows the project to pro-actively develop a suitable and sufficient work plan and control measures to allow it to proceed more smoothly. This results in fewer delays or disruptions caused by unexpected or unnoticed asbestos discoveries later on in the project.

Task-specific training options

The British Drilling Association have identified the importance of AAT by making evidence of it a mandatory requirement for all drillers undertaking the BDA Audit from 1st October 2024. In response to this, ground engineering training specialists Equipe Group have developed a task-specific asbestos awareness training course, titled ‘Asbestos Awareness for Ground Engineering’ and have been providing free access to the course to all BDA member companies until the audit requirement comes into force on 1st October. The course is taken online and is available on-demand via their GEO Academy e-learning platform.

Calum Spires, Operations Director at Equipe explains more about the course: “Providing customers with task-specific and industry focussed training courses is what we do. Whether that is site supervisory training or CAT & Genny training, we always believe that when it comes to health and safety, it should be task-specific and industry related. Equipe already delivers a ground engineering-focussed non-licensed asbestos in soils course. However, we recognise that not all ground engineering companies choose to work with asbestos or carry out work which may disturb asbestos, and therefore, offering a ground engineering focussed Asbestos Awareness Training will help BDA members and other ground engineering employers meet their legal obligations.”

The need for task-specific asbestos awareness training in the ground engineering sector cannot be overstated and as discussed above is an integral part of HSE guidance. While generic construction-related training provides a valuable foundation, it is insufficient to address the unique risks faced by ground engineering workers. By investing in tailored training programs that reflect the realities of their work and workplace, companies can better protect their workers, ensure compliance with legal requirements, and improve project outcomes. In an industry where the stakes are high, there is no substitute for task-specific knowledge and preparedness.

Article provided by Calum Spires, Operations Director and Julian Lovell, Managing Director, Equipe Group

For further information, contact:

Calum Spires

Equipe Group

+ 44 (0)1295 670990

calum.spires@equipegroup.com