Article

AGS Annual Conference 2024 Summary

- by
Tags: Featured

The AGS Annual Conference took place at One Great George Street, London on 25th April with over 235 delegates in attendance.

Chaired by AGS Chair, Vivien Dent, the conference had eight guest speakers covering a range of geotechnical and geoenvironmental topics with a focus on sustainability. The AGS Working Group Leaders also provided updates about their Working Groups from the past 12 months.

To continue the theme of sustainability, the conference showcased all 21 entries from the AGS’ Early Careers Professional Sustainability Poster Competition, and invited winner, Molly Kirven, (Balfour Beatty) to attend the event. The AGS have also agreed to donate a percentage of profits generated from the conference to Projects for Nature, which is an initiative formed by the Council for Sustainable Business, Accenture, Defra, Natural England, Environment Agency and Crowdfunder, that aims to restore nature recovery in the UK.

Jim Webster (Director at Earthworks and Materials Solutions) opened the conference by discussing what sustainability means in terms of earthworks. This was followed by Tim Rolfe (Director at YES Environmental) who presented on The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Reducing Soil Disposal and Importation at Contaminated Sites. Roseanna Bloxham (Principal Geo-Environmental Engineer at RSK Environment) explored the recent NHBC Foundation research and guidance for the housing sector, focusing on the NF93 report, which looks at the climate change risks impacting building foundations in new housing.

Following lunch and networking opportunities, Mark Hill (Climate and Sustainability Lead at The Pensions Regulator) presented on how the Taskforce for Climate-related Financial Disclosures and Sustainable Disclosures Requirement could impact brownfield and infrastructure sectors from a pensions perspective. Ebenezer Adenmosun (Managing Director at Geofirma and Co-Founder of the Ground Forum Undergraduate Mentoring Scheme) then provided an update on GFUMP and the impact the scheme has made on the industry.

This was followed by a presentation by Marla Gillow (Senior Geotechnical Engineer at Ramboll) and Kalisha Sejpar (Associate at Ramboll) on Case Study: Measuring Carbon from Design to Construction at 2 Finsbury Avenue. Finally, Alan Thomas (Technical Partner at ERM) presented on Insights from the Sustainable Remediation of an Agrochemical Manufacturing Facility.

The Annual Conference concluded with a networking drinks reception in the Great Hall, which was a first for the AGS Annual Conference.

It was a great event and a brilliant opportunity for the industry to gather, network and exchange ideas.

The AGS would like to take this opportunity to thank our speakers and sponsors including Geosense, Igne, Soil Engineering, Groundsure, Equipe, Brimstone, ACS Testing, Maccaferri, Eijkelkamp Fraste UK, Envirolab, Landmark Information Group, i2 Analytical, AFITEXINOV UK, BAM Ritchies, Lankelma, Insitu Site Investigation and Geotechnical Engineering.

Article Data Management

BS8574 – A Guide to Data Management Plans – Webinar Summary

- by
Tags: Featured

On 12th March 2024, the AGS held a webinar entitled ‘BS8574 – A Guide to Data Management Plans’.

The webinar was chaired by Jackie Bland (Principal Ground Investigation Data Manager at Structural Soils and AGS Data Management Working Group Leader), and included presentations from Neil Chadwick (Director, Digital Geotechnical), Tony Daly (Managing Director at Amageo Limited), Simon Miles (Chief Geotechnical Engineer, AtkinsRéalis) and Craig Brown (Senior Data Manager – BAM Ritchies).

Neil Chadwick began the webinar by providing an overview of BS8574, highlighting the requirements for a data management system to provide context for the discussion of data management plans. This was followed by a presentation from Tony Daly who provided a client’s perspective. Simon Miles then gave a presentation on BS8574 from the consultant’s viewpoint. Craig Brown provided the final presentations on the perspective of data management plans from a ground investigation contractor and guidance for preparing data management plans. The AGS Data Management Working Group have produced some guidance for the preparation of data management plans for ground engineering projects, which can be viewed on the AGS website here. The guidance is split into two parts, the first part provides considerations that should be made when writing a data management plan and the second part gives a practical example demonstrating how to meet the requirements with additional notes on considerations for each topic. The webinar ended with a group Q&A.

The event received excellent feedback, with attendees rating it 4.6 out of 5 stars and stating that they would be 4.5 out of 5 stars likely to recommend the webinar to a friend or colleague. Over 96% stated that they had learnt something new from the presentations that could be applied to their work.

A big thank you to all who attended, and to SoilCloud for sponsoring the webinar.

Want to access the recording but didn’t register to attend? AGS Members can access this for free via the webinar archive after logging in to the AGS website. Non-members may also request access via the AGS website for a charge of £30+VAT.

News

AGS Magazine: May 2024

- by
Tags: Featured

The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists is pleased to announce the May 2024 issue of their publication; AGS Magazine. To view the magazine click here.

This free, publication focuses on geotechnics, engineering geology and geoenvironmental engineering as well as the work and achievements of the AGS.

There are a number of excellent articles in this issue including;

Geotechnica 2024 – First Speakers Announced – Page 8

We Need To Talk About Groundwater – AGS Conference – Page 12

AGS Annual Conference 2024 – The Review – Page 16

NEC Option X29: A positive step to tackling climate change, but not without its risks – Page 20

NHBC’s new Performance Standard for Building on Engineered Fill – Page 24

Do geotechnical engineers truly understand sustainability? – Page 30

Standards Update: April 2024 – Page 36

Plus much, much more!

Advertising opportunities are available within future issues of the publication. To view rates and opportunities please view our media pack by clicking HERE.

If you have a news story, article, case study or event which you’d like to tell our editorial team about please email ags@ags.org.uk. Articles should act as opinion pieces and not directly advertise a company. Please note that the publication of editorial and advertising content is subject to the discretion of the editorial board.

Article

Early Careers Sustainability Competition Entries

- by

Thank you to those who entered our AGS Early Careers Sustainability Poster competition. We received 21 entries from across 18 different companies, each with their own unique take on the competition brief.

The judges, Vivien Dent (AGS Chair, Environment Agency), Sally Hudson (AGS Past-Chair, Coffey Geotechnics) and Alex Lee (AGS Chair-Elect, HKA) had the challenging task of judging the entries, but were pleased to announce that Molly Kirven (Balfour Beatty) came out on top.

Congratulations to Molly – she’s won a Selfridges hamper, entry to the AGS Annual Conference plus a double page spread within AGS Magazine, showcasing her entry and inspiration behind the poster.

Thank you to all those who took the time to submit an entry – they were all showcased at the AGS Annual Conference and viewed by our 230+ attending delegates.

 

 

Article News Business Practice Contaminated Land Data Management Executive Geotechnical Instrumentation & Monitoring Laboratories Loss Prevention Safety Sustainability

AGS Awards 2024

- by

We’re delighted to announce this year’s AGS Award winners!

Chosen from a select number of AGS Working Group Members, these winners were nominated by their Working Group Leaders in testament to their hard work and dedication to the AGS over the past year.

A huge well done and thank you to the following Award and commendation winners for their extraordinary work and ongoing contributions to the AGS:

Contaminated Land Working Group Award Winners

  • Andrew Tranter, Associate Technical Director at RSK
  • Darren Makin, GI Geoenvironmental Lead at Socotec

Executive Award Winner

  • Alex Dent, Associate Director at WSP

Executive Commendation

  • Alison Nicholson, Geoenvironmental Team Lead, Associate Geoenvironmental Consultant at Buro Happold

Data Management Working Group Award

  • Neil Chadwick, Director at Digital Geotechnical

Geotechnical Working Group Award

  • Katharine Barker, Associate at CampbellReith
  • Emma Cronin, Heathrow GI Senior Geotechnical Engineer at Socotec

Geotechnical Working Group Commendation

  • Paul Roberts, Regional Director, Ground Engineering, UK & Ireland Aecom

Laboratories Working Group Award

  • Will Fardon, Technical Director at Chemtech Environmental

Loss Prevention Working Group Award

  • David Hutchinson, AGS Honorary Member
  • Neil Parry, Director at Geotechnical Engineering

Safety Working Group Award

  • Liz Withington, Principal EngineeringGeologist at CC Ground Investigations
  • Madeleine Bardsley, Technical Director at WSP

Safety Working Group Commendation

  • Owen Seymour, Associate- Engineering Geologist (Geotechnical & Tunnelling) at WSP

Sustainability Working Group Award

  • Vivien Dent, Technical Specialist: Green Growth and Delivery at the Environment Agency
  • Sam Setchell, Principal Engineering Geologist at Jackson Geo Services

 

To view the montage of acceptance speeches from our winners, just click on the video below.

 

 

 

News

AGS Magazine: March 2024

- by
Tags: Featured

The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists is pleased to announce the March 2024 issue of their publication; AGS Magazine. To view the magazine click here.

This free, publication focuses on geotechnics, engineering geology and geoenvironmental engineering as well as the work and achievements of the AGS.

There are a number of excellent articles in this issue including;
AGS Annual Conference 2024 – Page 10
AGS Bitesize Guide: Pile design based on calculation – ground model method – Page 16
Calibration of BRE365 soakaway testing – Page 22
Sharing Ground Models using AGSi – Page 28
Site Supervision – Shouldn’t we be specific? – Page 32
Inside: SoilCloud SAS – Page 34

Plus much, much more!

Advertising opportunities are available within future issues of the publication. To view rates and opportunities please view our media pack by clicking HERE.

If you have a news story, article, case study or event which you’d like to tell our editorial team about please email ags@ags.org.uk. Articles should act as opinion pieces and not directly advertise a company. Please note that the publication of editorial and advertising content is subject to the discretion of the editorial board.

Article

BRE365 Soakaway Testing; Discussion on Safety and Alternatives

- by
Tags: Featured

Since 2007 when the first SuDS manual was published, AGS members have increasingly been asked to provide services to support design of sustainable urban drainage systems. The author of this article has been working with the BRE365 test since the 1990s and is still supervising, designing and reporting infiltration rate results to designers from trial pit and borehole methods.

AGS has recently been investigating how our industry manages undertaking and reporting infiltration rates for design of devices for discharge of surface water into land including; soakaways, basins, swales and permeable paving. Amongst members, the almost exclusive method requested by clients is to follow the BRE DG365 procedure as discussed in the AGS article (ref AGS magazine Oct 2021).

BRE DG365 is an empirical methodology for the design of soakaways, which includes the test procedure to provide observational data on infiltration rates. It was not intended for either basins or permeable paving. Because of the sparse nature of the test instructions, how it is carried out and reported can vary between practitioners. Concerns were first raised in the AGS safety working group at the same time as general trial pitting methods came under renewed scrutiny. The geotechnical working group was also requested to look at data quality in context, which resulted in the previous article. It is recognised that AGS members’ risk assessments and method statements on trial pitting may have been extended to cover BRE365 by written procedures to keep inexperienced staff safe in conducting these in-situ tests. Innovations and modifications may also have been made to the BRE365 method, to standardise in-house practice and to avoid taking up excessive resources during what can be a logistical challenge of labour, plant and materials.

This article is intended to build on the previous article, briefly cover the test origins and discuss what alternatives might be possible.

The development of technology of infiltration testing can be traced through publications. The following list shows an incomplete chronology.

1973 BRE151 Soakaways – (also NHBC 5.3.11) Soakaways BRE Digest 151, Watford. Building Research Establishment (Digest 151 is presented currently as a method in NHBC Standards https://nhbc-standards.co.uk/5-substructure-ground-floors-drainage-and-basements/5-3-drainage-below-ground/5-3-11-surface-water-soakaways/ )
1991 SR 271 The Hydraulic Design of Soakaways Report The Hydraulic Design of Soakaways Report SR271 1991 by DC Watkins published by HR Wallingford is available as a free resource here https://eprints.hrwallingford.com/311/ and describes the modelled water flow processes in a soakaway.
1991 (latest revision 2016) BRE365 Soakaway Design Empirical method of soakaway design including test for infiltration rate.
1996 R156 Infiltration drainage – Manual of good practice CIRIA report Report 156 1996 Infiltration drainage – Manual of good practice Roger Bettess BSc PhD MCIWEM. Provides an infiltration test procedure similar to BRE365 but with some variations and extra information.
2007 (Version 6 including 2016, 2018, 2019) C753 The SuDS Manual The current reference for Suds Approval Boards/Lead Local Flood Authorities (SAB/LLFA) in the UK is the The SuDS Manual (C753) https://www.ciria.org/ItemDetail?iProductCode=C753&Category=BOOK&WebsiteKey=3f18c87a-d62b-4eca-8ef4-9b09309c1c91.

BRE 151 & NHBC 5.3.11 involves recording the time for a fixed height of water to drain in a small trial hole. The time t is graphically translated to a soakaway size using correlations which have uncertain/unknown justification.

SR271 indicates that flow in unsaturated ground is different to saturated ground in four main respects (head in the fluid is due to suction, storage coefficient and conductivity are variables, and gravity induces vertical flow), and compares in-situ test results with those obtained from numerical modelling using Richards modified equation. By relying on testing at the proposed location of the device and use of bulk factors of safety the design philosophy is confirmed to be experimental. Uncertainties do not include the possibility of significant variations in soil type at the location of the test (and by implication the soakaway).  This may be a point of contention with some practitioners used to UK shallow geology.

The work in R156 was carried out by HR Wallingford under contract to CIRIA in the period October 1991 to March 1995. R156 cites many other sources of information (BRE were part of the steering group represented by Dr John Powell). The extra information in R156 does help to confirm the experimental nature of the test specific to the location of the proposed infiltration device and the intrinsic adoption of bulk safety factors. This requires that the location of the device (test site) must be chosen by a designer.

C753 probably deserves an AGS article on its own. In Chapter 01 – The philosophy of SuDs, the 3-D conceptual model in Figure 1.2 models the underlying geology as a grey monoblock rather than layers of strata for example which is a shame. In nearly 1000 pages of C753 the word geology occurs 16 times, frequently associated with land stability; ecology is listed 42 times and archaeology once. Possibly geology is not that important to the delivery of SuDs, but is regarded as a constraint. AGS members are probably most interested in SuDs Section 25 Infiltration design methods, and specifically 25.3 Infiltration Testing Methods and Appendix B.4 Infiltration Assessment. Appendix B.4 includes a checklist (Table B6) intended for use by the approving bodies (and the designers) which assumes competence in ground assessments, which may not be available in all design teams. There are plenty of apparently excellent SuDS case studies, but they don’t generally include details of the geology or infiltration tests and how infiltration challenges were overcome. Competent ground assessors would surely benefit designers.

Discussion

The SUDS manual is probably the most important document for members and designers to understand. Unfortunately, members may only be requested to perform the BRE365 test and nothing else.

In my experience, over-winter (wosrt-case) water level monitoring has been more frequently requested by designers indicating a more favourable approach to ground modelling.

It seems the current SuDS manual was written with Eurocodes in mind, but apparently not integrated possibly due to the embedded modelling from SR271 between test, device design and bulk safety factors. Mention of 14688 & 14689 in the B6 checklist are assumed to enable initial permeability assessments to be made by designers from descriptions correlated to published permeability values. In such cases, ground practitioners might note subtle fines content descriptors in coarse soils which could lead to significantly different engineering properties in tests. Designers and regulators might just see either SAND or CLAY and get a wrong outcome.

It is tempting to assume that permeability and infiltration approximate to the same value but that may not be accurate. Scale & geology variations mean that measurements of permeability in small laboratory samples cannot be representative unless part of a fully developed ground characterisation. In any event permeability cannot be used in exactly the same way as infiltration rate due to the modelling/empirical link between test and the device design. It is the device (soakaway/basin) that has a characteristic design value of infiltration (usually the tested soil worst-case), and potentially too conservative if water will find preferential pathways and bulk safety factors are deployed. Whilst the SuDS manual includes falling head tests in ISO 22282-2:2012 as acceptable in principle, there are conditions and limitations. There may be parallels here with the recent AGS presentation on sample disturbance where taking a few high quality and well-selected data sets might be considered “better” than many more data of variable/unknown control. We might assume that falling head test data should be presented as a part of a full Eurocode characterisation of the ground to be compliant. Simply replacing isolated infiltration data from a trial pit with more falling head tests in a borehole is likely inadequate, although potentially safer for operatives and might use less resources.

Use of boreholes as a device for obtaining infiltration data is a natural ambition for AGS members seeking compliance with standards and health and safety. However, if the depth of infiltration is limited, for example, by the Environment Agency through planning to less than 2m depth (as been the experience of the author) then the preference for using trial pits is understandable. A daisy-chain or in series hierarchy approach from initial water harvesting to bulk basin attenuation with limited shallow infiltration finally to deep soakaways for overflow situations might be good design but is not necessarily supported by case study.

There is also Geotechnical investigation and testing – Geohydraulic testing – Part 5: Infiltrometer tests (ISO 22282-5:2012), which exclusively describes the various types of ring infiltrometer test; single or double ring, open and closed. In these tests, flow through the side is not included, therefore not compatible with the SR271 modelling. However, the ring infiltrometer would logically be more appropriate for plane devices such as permeable pavements if the modelling is different. Again in my experience, It seems shallow depth BRE365s is preferred by designers for permeable paving.

Conclusion

From this discussion, there are no obvious “off the shelf” replacement alternatives to the BRE365 test to recommend to members.  Noting the fundamental link in the digest between the design output and the in-situ test. However, practitioners might note that although BRE365 was most recently updated in 2016, Bettes 1996 (R156) is the primary reference in the SUDs manual.

The alternatives to BRE365 should be ISO 22282-2 or ISO 22282-5 neither is wholly recommendable (or likely to be accepted nationwide) as a direct replacement.

To support a sustainable agenda wider use of understanding ground models at the initial stage is recommended and not to rely on limited study & a small data set of BRE365 tests. A site where there is a 3m thick layer of clay over 10m of unsaturated permeable sands; three 2m deep tests would indicate infiltration is not possible resulting in the design of an attenuation basin occupying potentially unnecessary space and wasting other resources. A conceptual model, initial investigation and targeted deeper BRE365 tests may result in a much more sustainable scheme.

BRE365 and the SuDS manual could be updated to include the modern context such as health and safety including the gravel filling of test pits, responsible use of resources/logistics and adoption of dataloggers. Guidance could be provided on the benefits of a good geological characterisation and what benefits could be gained from having representative/characteristic high quality data rather than the adoption of worst-case values because of limited data. More case studies might be expanded to include problem solving where poor draining geology has been overcome by engineering for example using linear features which can intercept preferential pathways in variable soil/rock. Or combined systems featuring infiltration devices of limited/known capacity linked to bulk attenuation and final overspill into deep borehole soakaways.

The AGS is keen to hear examples of good practice for safely undertaking the BRE365 methodology and examples where SuDs design has been informed by alternatives to the conventional BRE365 method.  Please contact the AGS at ags@ags.org.uk with examples or comments.

Article provided by James Harrison of 4D Geo Limited

Article

INSIDE SOILCLOUD

- by
Tags: Featured

Name: Tomasz Daktera

Job title: President

Company name: SoilCloud SAS

What does the company do and what areas does it specialise in?

SoilCloud provides a Geotechnical data management web software (AGS compatible). We are leading the digital transition of geotechnical engineering in France (over 60% of all geotechnical data and tests in France are being analysed by our system). We are also present in the UK and 5 other countries around the world.

Where is SoilCloud located?
Our Headquarters are located in France, Paris.

How many people does the company employ?
We are 7 fascinated engineers at SoilCloud.

How long have you worked at SoilCloud?
Together with Lucas Janodet, we have co-founded SoilCloud in 2018.

What is your career background, and what enticed you to work for SoilCloud?
Together with Lucas Janodet, both geotechnical engineers, we have founded SoilCloud to engage the digital transition in the industry and to make more efficient.

What is your current role within SoilCloud and what does a typical day entail?
As president, I am dealing with medium term and long projects as well as product development, global strategy and international sales.

What are the company’s core values?
Our core values are related to the way we operate. We put our clients and their needs and feedback first.

Are there any projects or achievements which SoilCloud are particularly proud to have been a part of?
In 2023, we have won the Solscope Innovation award, which is the most prestigious prize in geotechnical engineering in France (distributed once every two years). SoilCloud’s software and vision has been recognized as a global change in the whole French geotechnical industry.

How does SoilCloud support graduates and early career professionals who are entering the industry?
In our team, one of our IT developers is an apprentice still attending school 2 days a week. Young professionals have a great amount of positive energy which encourages the whole team to work together to deliver a great product.

Why do you feel the AGS is important to the industry?
As a leader in the digital transition of the geotechnical industry, SoilCloud is strongly promoting the AGS format around the world. The AGS format is something that was ahead of its time in the previous years and the industry is, just now, understanding the great added value of it.

What are SoilCloud’s future ambitions?
2000 satisfied users in 2024. Today, we have about 1800 users and counting.

Article

AGS Early Careers Webinar Series – Common Risks of GIs, Identification and Mitigation Summary

- by
Tags: Featured

On 24th January 2024, the AGS held an Early Careers webinar entitled Common Risks of GIs, Identification and Mitigation.

The webinar was chaired by Harry McAllister (Senior Consultant, TRC Companies) and included presentations from Lauren Hunt (Geoenvironmental Consultant, Arcadis), Vicki Morten (Associate Technical Director, Arcadis), Will Capps (Technical Manager, Delta-Simons), Amy Juden (Head of Geoenvironmental at The Environmental Protection Group), Leo Phillips (Environmental Monitoring Manager at The Environmental Protection Group) and Jon Rayner (SH&E Director, AECOM).

Lauren Hunt and Vicki Morten began the webinar with their insights on Site Supervision and Regulations, highlighting the role of the Site Supervisor and Construction Design and Management (CDM) Regulations. This was followed by a presentation from Will Capps on Buried Utilities Do’s and Don’ts, where Will provided an overview of methods available to avoid striking underground utilities during Site Investigation. Amy Juden followed with a presentation on Asbestos in Soil: Exposure, Risk and Mitigation, focusing on exposure risk from asbestos in soil and how to effectively manage it when planning and undertaking site works. Leo Phillips then spoke about Ground Gas Risks: Key Considerations When Completing Field Work, before Jon Rayner’s final presentation on Safety Culture, Putting Your Right Foot Forwards. The webinar ended with a group Q&A.

If you missed the webinar, the recording is now live on the AGS website and is free for AGS members and non-members.

Article

Gain Skills to Champion Excellence in the Geoprofessions at GBA’s Annual Conference

- by
Tags: Featured

Geoprofessionals from across North America will gather at Geoprofessional Business Association’s (GBA) 2024 Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2024, at the JW Marriott, Anaheim Resort in Anaheim, California. With a theme of “Champion Excellence,” conference participants will gain the skills and knowledge to actively promote and support the pursuit of exceptional performance, quality, and success in all aspects of their firm.

Keynote speakers include New York Times best-selling author and innovation consultant Diana Kander and famed one-handed Major League Baseball pitcher Jim Abbott.

The event offers opportunities for development of highly sought-after skills such as communication, innovation, and overcoming adversity, as well as Business Round Table Sessions – the unique chance to discuss problem-solving, best practices, and strategies with geoprofessional peers about the issues impacting the industry.

Those who are newer to the geoprofessions can engage with executive-level industry leaders, connect with new mentors, and boost their professional profiles. Mid-level geoprofessionals can unlock new leadership opportunities, exchange best practices for risk management, and network with hundreds of like-minded professionals. Seasoned geoprofessionals can share strategic insights as they address industry challenges and contribute to the elevation of the profession with their invaluable experiences.

The GBA Annual Conference offers up to 6.5 professional development hours.

Early registration rates are now in effect, but rates will increase on March 1.

Learn more and register here.

News

AGS Magazine: January 2024

- by
Tags: Featured

The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists is pleased to announce the January 2024 issue of their publication; AGS Magazine. To view the magazine click here.

This free, publication focuses on geotechnics, engineering geology and geoenvironmental engineering as well as the work and achievements of the AGS.

There are a number of excellent articles in this issue including;
UK’s premier geotechnical conference returns in 2024 – Page 6
New version of AGS Piling released – Page 9
AGS Annual Conference 2024 – Page 12
Geotechnical unit, Ground models and Geotechnical Design Models– what are these, what do they cover and who is responsible? – Page 19
Calibration of Whatman Grade 42 filter paper for soil suction measurements – Page 22
AGS Guide to Welfare: A step in the right direction – Page 28
Inside: Igne Group – Page 34

Plus much, much more!

Advertising opportunities are available within future issues of the publication. To view rates and opportunities please view our media pack by clicking HERE.

If you have a news story, article, case study or event which you’d like to tell our editorial team about please email ags@ags.org.uk. Articles should act as opinion pieces and not directly advertise a company. Please note that the publication of editorial and advertising content is subject to the discretion of the editorial board.

Article

INSIDE IGNE

- by
Tags: Featured

Name: Peter Widdowson

Job title: Director Business Development

Company name: Igne Group Limited

What does the company do and what areas does it specialise in?

Igne is the new brand for six combining businesses which share a group history of 350 years’ service in site investigation, materials testing, unexploded ordnance threat mitigation, water well drilling, geothermal borehole drilling and geo-environmental consultancy.

We know our collective services must be delivered more effectively and sustainably than ever which is why the businesses have fused together to respond more efficiently to our customers in the pre-construction and construction phase environments.

Our vision is to become the most trusted tier-one partner for environmentally sustainable site investigation and drilling services across the entire construction and infrastructure lifecycle in built environments throughout the UK.

Any single part of Igne can respond to customers’ needs in each of our specialist areas, simplifying the process for clients and consistently ensuring the provision of the same level of service and expertise.

Where is Igne located?

Igne has offices in Aberdeen, Airdrie, and Hamilton in Scotland; Preston, Chester le Street, Birmingham, Aylesbury and Gillingham in England; and Presteigne in Wales.  Our head office is Ross on Wye, a beautiful part of Herefordshire.

How many people does the company employ?

We employ circa 300 full time staff and rely on many exceptional contract staff who support us when we need to call on them.

How long have you worked at Igne?

I joined Igne in a brand-new role for the company in June 2023 (so 6 months and happily counting.)

What is your career background, and what enticed you to work for Igne?

I am a professional Civil Engineer and a member of the Institution of Civil Engineers.  My background has been in tier 1 and 2 civil engineering and building construction contracting, working across Scotland principally, but also supporting businesses in the North of England, around Manchester and Warrington.

Over the last 10 years, my roles have focused more on business development and work winning.

When the opportunity came to join Igne ahead of its official launch on 2nd October 2023, I was really excited for a variety of reasons.  Firstly, I would be able to expand my own knowledge across a number of new sectors.  I was most commonly on the receiving end of site investigation reports – now I would get to promote best practice in site investigation for clients.

Secondly, I would be able to start working more directly in an area that I believe is one of the future solutions to decarbonising heat in the UK, harnessing geothermal energy.

Finally, I would be able to start practising what I have always preached; that the greatest risk to any construction project lies in the ground.  Understanding the ground conditions early on can help project teams understand the hazards and provide mitigation solutions to problems that can otherwise cause severe delay, disruption and additional costs to a project.

At Igne, I now represent a business that gets its hands dirty, so to speak, and does the work that I know is critical for a project’s success.  We are one of the specialist contractors, and consultants, who will lead with the advice and intelligence that we can provide, backed by the expertise that we have, to ensure our clients’ successes.

What is your current role within Igne and what does a typical day entail?

There are several threads to my role within Igne as I support each of our business units and service streams.

I led on the communication to all current and previous customers relating to our change to becoming Igne from 2nd October 2023.  Some parts of the now-combined business had incredibly well-established names and were known by many as the ‘go to’ supplier for their work.  Changing the brand to Igne is significant but has been well-supported by all involved.  The communication piece was critical to tie up all loose ends.

My key role day-to-day is to support each business to identify and secure the opportunity to negotiate and tender for future work.  We need to share our broad capabilities with our current customers who may know us primarily for one service – such as UXO or site investigation – but not realise we can now offer them so much more.

We need to understand our customers and future customers and the markets in which they operate, so that we can continually improve for each individual customer.  My role looks at how we deliver today but also how we might deliver tomorrow in partnerships and alliances or through acquisitions.

I truly believe, with a passion, that we can help all clients, whether they are developers, consultants, contractors or individual homeowners, to understand their project better to reduce cost, stay on programme, improve safety, reduce environmental and ecological impact and carbon intensity, and the demand on natural resources.  It is my role to communicate that passion to our future customers and show them what we can do for them.

What are the company’s core values?

Our purpose is to enable sustainable communities and advance positive change. We do this through our values:

Reliability: Whatever the job, we focus on what matters, do things the right way and deliver real results. Dependable, positive and hugely knowledgeable, we provide skills and experience that people can rely on.

Partnership: We work in partnership with clients and stakeholders to find answers and reach shared goals. We build long-term relationships by being open, transparent and easy to work with. We are full of practical ideas that people can put into action.

Quality: We are dedicated to our work and passionate about quality. We set high standards and work hard every day to meet and advance them. We speak up, act with integrity and offer honest advice people can trust.

Are there any projects or achievements which Igne is particularly proud to have been a part of?

Delivering sonic drilling solutions to site investigation challenges in remote and inhospitable parts of beautiful Scotland, whilst also working in environmentally sensitive locations without damaging precious flora and fauna.

This demonstrates our core values in action:

Reliability, we can get the job done no matter the challenges we may need to overcome.
Quality, we deliver the highest quality works maintaining sensitivity to the environment or communities within which we are operating.
Partnership, to work with our client to determine the best way and best value option to deliver the information they need.

Another example is clearing unexploded ordnance from a 5-hectare area of the Dorset coast for the National Trust.  The area had been badly damaged by and exposed several hundred items of live and inert ammunition.  We cleared this former training area, rendering it safe for public access once again.

How important is sustainability within the company?

Incredibly important – sustainability is at the heart of our purpose and is our vision.  In everything that we do today, we are thinking about tomorrow.  It is the very purpose of our business, to provide the data to inform our customers about the most sustainable way to develop their project.

It is also important to us that we continually improve how we go about achieving this, to minimise our own impact.  For example, as we transitioned to become Igne, all our old PPE was recycled with 0% going to landfill.  This ensured we reduced CO2 emissions by 13kg per 1kg recycled – and we reduced water consumption by 1litre per 1kg recycled as the old workwear become new garments.

How does Igne support graduates and early career professionals who are entering the industry?

Our CEO, Rob Hunter, is committed to advancing social mobility and does a lot of work in a voluntary capacity to advance the cause.  Therefore, it is unsurprising that Igne has an acute focus on developing early talent at the heart of its workforce plan.

We have various routes to support young people entering the industries and specialisms we span.  We have graduate and apprentice routes into roles such as engineers, geologists, administrators, marketers, HR professionals, drilling crews and many more.

We go into colleges and universities to teach and help young people understand what the industry is like.  We don’t sugar-coat what life can be like as a driller for example, but for the right people, it is a hugely rewarding career.

We do need to improve how we communicate the available careers to young people, to get them interested in what we do at Igne and in the wider industry.  If we can do this successfully, it will help us to stem the recruitment and people-resource issues that we face.  Attracting the right people in the first place, and nurturing their talent is the route to a more sustainable workforce solution.  It is a core company focus for us.

How has COVID-19 impacted Igne today? Are there any policies which were made during the pandemic that have been kept to improve employee wellbeing and productivity?

Yes, absolutely.  The flexibility we developed across the businesses, which was generated as a result of COVID-19 and the ways of working that we had to adopt, has demonstrated that a hybrid working practice is both possible, in appropriate circumstances, and beneficial to employee wellbeing and therefore productivity.

Our move to hybrid has helped us reduce our carbon footprint through reduced commuting, and our employees continue to demonstrate their commitment to the business reciprocating the trust the business puts it them.

Why do you feel the AGS is important to the industry?

I am a firm believer that the ground holds the greatest risk to any construction project no matter how large or small.  It is a constant source of challenge whether through geotechnical ground conditions, historic uses, contamination or protecting sensitive receptors.  If everybody worked in isolation, we would not deliver the results we need to develop our industry.  We must work collaboratively, share best practice and allow ourselves to learn from each other for the good of the planet, our employees and the communities in which we work – and we must enjoy a collective voice.  For me, AGS helps to facilitate the foregoing across our industry, so, it is a ‘no-brainer’ – AGS is critically important to our industry.

What are Igne’s future ambitions?

Our ambition is to consolidate the capabilities from across the group, to enable us to deliver more than the sum of our parts through shared learning and commitment to delivering a holistic and integrated service for our customers.  We are also committed to continuing to grow our capabilities in the direction led by our customers’ needs.  This is what excites me the most.  In doing so, we will become the most trusted partner to the construction industry, providing pre- and post-construction services they can absolutely rely upon.